Migraine represents the third cause of disability in the worldwide population aged under 50 years. Facing this enormous social impact, only onabotulinumtoxinA has been evaluated, on serendipity basis, as effective chronic migraine preventative treatment [1]. Pharmacological research is now moving important steps forward towards bridging the 30-year gap of new preventative class drugs for migraine, with a new molecule in its final phase of development: monoclonal antibodies for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptors (CGRPr) [2,3]. In the development pipeline of new drugs for the acute treatment, there is only one innovative compound, lasmiditan [4], while there are numerous devices and nutraceuticals in both categories [5]. This is surely not the scenario that one billion of migraine patients is hoping for from scientific research, and a new call for action is required in order to promote the study on new innovative drugs for the acute treatment of migraine. This would reduce the personal, working, and pharmaco-economic impact and the public health expenditure caused by this pathology, that could be appropriately defined as a social disease from now on.

Acute treatment of migraine: quo vadis? / Martelletti, Paolo. - In: EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY. - ISSN 1465-6566. - STAMPA. - 18:11(2017), pp. 1-3. [10.1080/14656566.2017.1329821]

Acute treatment of migraine: quo vadis?

MARTELLETTI, Paolo
2017

Abstract

Migraine represents the third cause of disability in the worldwide population aged under 50 years. Facing this enormous social impact, only onabotulinumtoxinA has been evaluated, on serendipity basis, as effective chronic migraine preventative treatment [1]. Pharmacological research is now moving important steps forward towards bridging the 30-year gap of new preventative class drugs for migraine, with a new molecule in its final phase of development: monoclonal antibodies for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptors (CGRPr) [2,3]. In the development pipeline of new drugs for the acute treatment, there is only one innovative compound, lasmiditan [4], while there are numerous devices and nutraceuticals in both categories [5]. This is surely not the scenario that one billion of migraine patients is hoping for from scientific research, and a new call for action is required in order to promote the study on new innovative drugs for the acute treatment of migraine. This would reduce the personal, working, and pharmaco-economic impact and the public health expenditure caused by this pathology, that could be appropriately defined as a social disease from now on.
2017
acute migraine treatment; CGRP(r) antagonists; NSAIDs; lasmiditan; triptans
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Acute treatment of migraine: quo vadis? / Martelletti, Paolo. - In: EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY. - ISSN 1465-6566. - STAMPA. - 18:11(2017), pp. 1-3. [10.1080/14656566.2017.1329821]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Martelletti_Acute-treatment_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: editorial
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 679.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
679.79 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/971055
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact