We studied the effects of negative cognitive style, sad mood, and facial affect on the self-face advantage in a sample of 66 healthy individuals (mean age 26.5 years, range 1947 years). The sample was subdivided into four groups according to inferential style and responsivity to sad mood induction. Following a sad mood induction, we examined the effect on working memory of an incidental association between facial affect, facial identity, and head-pose orientation. Overall, head-pose recognition was more accurate for the self-face than for nonself face (self-face advantage, SFA). However, participants high in negative cognitive style who experienced higher levels of sadness displayed a stronger SFA for sad expressions than happy expressions. The remaining participants displayed an opposite bias (a stronger SFA for happy expressions than sad expressions), or no bias. These findings highlight the importance of trait-vulnerability status in the working memory biases related to emotional facial expressions.

Do you remember your sad face? The roles of negative cognitive style and sad mood / Caudek, Corrado; Monni, Alessandra. - In: MEMORY. - ISSN 0965-8211. - ELETTRONICO. - 21:8(2013), pp. 891-903. [10.1080/09658211.2013.765893]

Do you remember your sad face? The roles of negative cognitive style and sad mood

Monni, Alessandra
2013

Abstract

We studied the effects of negative cognitive style, sad mood, and facial affect on the self-face advantage in a sample of 66 healthy individuals (mean age 26.5 years, range 1947 years). The sample was subdivided into four groups according to inferential style and responsivity to sad mood induction. Following a sad mood induction, we examined the effect on working memory of an incidental association between facial affect, facial identity, and head-pose orientation. Overall, head-pose recognition was more accurate for the self-face than for nonself face (self-face advantage, SFA). However, participants high in negative cognitive style who experienced higher levels of sadness displayed a stronger SFA for sad expressions than happy expressions. The remaining participants displayed an opposite bias (a stronger SFA for happy expressions than sad expressions), or no bias. These findings highlight the importance of trait-vulnerability status in the working memory biases related to emotional facial expressions.
2013
Cognitive bias; Emotion; Negative cognitive style; Sad mood induction; Self-face advantage; Working memory; Adult; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Depression; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Photic Stimulation; Reaction Time; Self Concept; Social Environment; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult; Affect; Cognition; Facial Expression; Memory; Psychology (all); Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Do you remember your sad face? The roles of negative cognitive style and sad mood / Caudek, Corrado; Monni, Alessandra. - In: MEMORY. - ISSN 0965-8211. - ELETTRONICO. - 21:8(2013), pp. 891-903. [10.1080/09658211.2013.765893]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/968560
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact