This article analyses the consequences of the referendum on the UK’s exit from the EU, examinating in particular the possibilities on the future relations between the UK and the EU. At this purpose, the author underlines the different possibilities: a) an agreement between the UK and the EU giving to the UK an ad hoc status; b) the reaccession of the UK to the EFTA; c) the UK accession to the European Economic Space (Norwegian model); d) the creation of a customs union (Turkish model); e) the adoption of a free trade agreement (Canadian model); f) a relation based on an high grade of free market combined with a legislation to improve investments (Hong Kong model); g) the application of the rules provided for the WTO. Having analysed the legal aspects of these models, the author concludes that none of these solutions fits the interests of the UK and thus formulates its considerations on the approach that should be followed.
L'articolo analizza le conseguenze del referendum per la c.d. Brexit sulle future relazione fra Regno Unito ed UE. A tal proposito, l'autore descrive diversi modelli di relazioni fra Stati ed organizzazioni internazionali che si sono sviluppati nella prassi internazionale, in modo da poter valutare quale di questi possa essere quello maggiormente idoneo a regolare i futuri rapporti fra Londra e Bruxelles.
Dopo la Brexit: quale modello per le future relazioni tra il Regno Unito e l’Unione europea? / CURTI GIALDINO, Carlo. - In: ORDINE INTERNAZIONALE E DIRITTI UMANI. - ISSN 2284-3531. - ELETTRONICO. - 3/2016(2016), pp. 530-544.
Dopo la Brexit: quale modello per le future relazioni tra il Regno Unito e l’Unione europea?
CURTI GIALDINO, Carlo
2016
Abstract
This article analyses the consequences of the referendum on the UK’s exit from the EU, examinating in particular the possibilities on the future relations between the UK and the EU. At this purpose, the author underlines the different possibilities: a) an agreement between the UK and the EU giving to the UK an ad hoc status; b) the reaccession of the UK to the EFTA; c) the UK accession to the European Economic Space (Norwegian model); d) the creation of a customs union (Turkish model); e) the adoption of a free trade agreement (Canadian model); f) a relation based on an high grade of free market combined with a legislation to improve investments (Hong Kong model); g) the application of the rules provided for the WTO. Having analysed the legal aspects of these models, the author concludes that none of these solutions fits the interests of the UK and thus formulates its considerations on the approach that should be followed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CurtiGialdino_Brexit_2016.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
216.12 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
216.12 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.