Background: Endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) may be an alternative treatment option to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME), in selected patients with N0 rectal cancer. Post-operative Quality of Life (QoL) evaluation is an important parameter of outcomes related to high percentage of functional sequelae. We reported, in a previous published paper, the short and medium term results of QoL in patients underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME. Aim: The aim is to evaluate the 3y QoL in patients with iT2-T3 N0/ + rectal cancer underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (n-RCT) in a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Materials and Methods: We enrolled in this study 39 patients with iT2–iT3 rectal cancer who underwent ELRR by TEM (n=19) or LTME (n=20), according to predefined criteria. QoL was evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires at admission, after n-RCT and 1, 6, 12 and 36 months after surgery. Results: No statistically significant differences in QoL evaluation were observed between the two groups, both at admission and after n-RCT. In short term (1–6 months) period, significantly better results were observed in ELRR group by QLQ-C30 in: Global Health Status (p=0.003), Physical Functioning (p=0.004), Role Functioning (p=0.004), Emotional Functioning (p=0.004), Cognitive Functioning, Fatigue (p=0.005), Dyspnoea (p=0.005), Insomnia (p=0.05), Appetite loss (p=0.05), Constipation (p=0.05); and by QLQ-CR38 in: Body Image (p=0.03) and Defecation (p=0.025). At 1 year, the two groups were homogenous as assessed by QLQ-C30, whereas the QLQCR38 still showed better results of ELRR vs. LTME in Body Image (p=0.006), Defecation Problems (p=0.01), and Weight Loss (p=0.005). At 3 years no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: In selected patient with rectal cancer, underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME, QoL testes at 3 years don’t show any statistical difference on examined items.

Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Treated by Endoluminal Loco-Regional Resection by Tem Vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: Long Term Results / D'Ambrosio, Giancarlo; Picchetto, Andrea; Campo, Salvatore; Palma, Rossella; Agostini, M.; Paganini, ALESSANDRO MARIA; Lezoche, E.. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - ELETTRONICO. - (2017), pp. 25-25. (Intervento presentato al convegno 25th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) tenutosi a Frankfurt, Germany, nel 14 – 17 June 2017) [10.1007/s00464-017-5540-y].

Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Treated by Endoluminal Loco-Regional Resection by Tem Vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: Long Term Results

D'AMBROSIO, Giancarlo;PICCHETTO, ANDREA;CAMPO, SALVATORE;PALMA, ROSSELLA;Agostini, M.;PAGANINI, ALESSANDRO MARIA;Lezoche, E.
2017

Abstract

Background: Endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) may be an alternative treatment option to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME), in selected patients with N0 rectal cancer. Post-operative Quality of Life (QoL) evaluation is an important parameter of outcomes related to high percentage of functional sequelae. We reported, in a previous published paper, the short and medium term results of QoL in patients underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME. Aim: The aim is to evaluate the 3y QoL in patients with iT2-T3 N0/ + rectal cancer underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (n-RCT) in a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Materials and Methods: We enrolled in this study 39 patients with iT2–iT3 rectal cancer who underwent ELRR by TEM (n=19) or LTME (n=20), according to predefined criteria. QoL was evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires at admission, after n-RCT and 1, 6, 12 and 36 months after surgery. Results: No statistically significant differences in QoL evaluation were observed between the two groups, both at admission and after n-RCT. In short term (1–6 months) period, significantly better results were observed in ELRR group by QLQ-C30 in: Global Health Status (p=0.003), Physical Functioning (p=0.004), Role Functioning (p=0.004), Emotional Functioning (p=0.004), Cognitive Functioning, Fatigue (p=0.005), Dyspnoea (p=0.005), Insomnia (p=0.05), Appetite loss (p=0.05), Constipation (p=0.05); and by QLQ-CR38 in: Body Image (p=0.03) and Defecation (p=0.025). At 1 year, the two groups were homogenous as assessed by QLQ-C30, whereas the QLQCR38 still showed better results of ELRR vs. LTME in Body Image (p=0.006), Defecation Problems (p=0.01), and Weight Loss (p=0.005). At 3 years no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: In selected patient with rectal cancer, underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME, QoL testes at 3 years don’t show any statistical difference on examined items.
2017
25th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)
quality of life, tatme, tem, rectal, cancer
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04c Atto di convegno in rivista
Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Treated by Endoluminal Loco-Regional Resection by Tem Vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: Long Term Results / D'Ambrosio, Giancarlo; Picchetto, Andrea; Campo, Salvatore; Palma, Rossella; Agostini, M.; Paganini, ALESSANDRO MARIA; Lezoche, E.. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - ELETTRONICO. - (2017), pp. 25-25. (Intervento presentato al convegno 25th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) tenutosi a Frankfurt, Germany, nel 14 – 17 June 2017) [10.1007/s00464-017-5540-y].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/964493
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact