Increasing evidence suggests that perception and action planning do not represent separable stages of a unidirectional processing sequence, but rather emerging properties of highly interactive processes. To capture these characteristics of the human cognitive system, we have developed a connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning: HiTEC, based on the Theory of Event Coding (Hommel et al. in Behav Brain Sci 24:849–937, 2001). The model is characterized by representations at multiple levels and by shared representations and processes. It complements available models of stimulus–response translation by providing a rationale for (1) how situation-specific meanings of motor actions emerge, (2) how and why some aspects of stimulus–response translation occur automatically and (3) how task demands modulate sensorimotor processing. The model is demonstrated to provide a unitary account and simulation of a number of key findings with multiple experimental paradigms on the interaction between perception and action such as the Simon effect, its inversion (Hommel in Psychol Res 55:270–279, 1993), and action–effect learning. © 2016, The Author(s).

HiTEC. A connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning / Haazebroek, Pascal; Raffone, Antonino; Hommel, Bernhard. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0340-0727. - ELETTRONICO. - 81:6(2017), pp. 1085-1109. [10.1007/s00426-016-0803-0]

HiTEC. A connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning

RAFFONE, Antonino;
2017

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that perception and action planning do not represent separable stages of a unidirectional processing sequence, but rather emerging properties of highly interactive processes. To capture these characteristics of the human cognitive system, we have developed a connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning: HiTEC, based on the Theory of Event Coding (Hommel et al. in Behav Brain Sci 24:849–937, 2001). The model is characterized by representations at multiple levels and by shared representations and processes. It complements available models of stimulus–response translation by providing a rationale for (1) how situation-specific meanings of motor actions emerge, (2) how and why some aspects of stimulus–response translation occur automatically and (3) how task demands modulate sensorimotor processing. The model is demonstrated to provide a unitary account and simulation of a number of key findings with multiple experimental paradigms on the interaction between perception and action such as the Simon effect, its inversion (Hommel in Psychol Res 55:270–279, 1993), and action–effect learning. © 2016, The Author(s).
2017
biological model; brain cortex; cognition; human; male; motor activity; perception; physiology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
HiTEC. A connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning / Haazebroek, Pascal; Raffone, Antonino; Hommel, Bernhard. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0340-0727. - ELETTRONICO. - 81:6(2017), pp. 1085-1109. [10.1007/s00426-016-0803-0]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Haazebroek_HiTEC_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 851.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
851.83 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/962934
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact