Introduction: The medical record contains all the health information related to the patient’s clinical condition and its evolution during hospitalization. It was defined by the Italian Ministry of Health in 1992 as "The information tool designed to record all relevant demographic and clinical information about a patient during a single episode of hospitalization". The documents and information in a Medical Record must meet the following criteria: traceability, clarity, accuracy, authenticity, pertinence and completeness. The objectives of our study was to develop a tool capable of assessing the quality of the clinical record and pointed the critical point at the Organizational, Technical - Professional, Managerial level. Methods: To evaluate the quality of the medical documentation, we created an assessment grid composed of 4 sections with a total of 92 criteria. This grid was tested on 200 medical records that were randomly selected from 25 (18 medical and 7 surgical) wards of a teaching hospital in Rome. Results: The grid contains 4 sections. The first part regards administrative and clinical data; the second assesses the quality of hospital stay and surgical/invasive procedures; the third part is concerned with the discharge of the patient and the fourth aims to identify the presence of advisory reports given to the patient. This grid has been validated to verify internal consistency with Cronbach's Alpha = 0,743. Conclusions: Medical records were analyzed using a validated tool with grids to identify critical issues in care activities. Weaknesses in the system were identified in order to improve planning. The sample testing also in terms of ‘self-assessment' represents a tool to introduce activities to improve safety and quality of care, greatly reducing the costs of litigation.

Malpractice and patient safety descriptors: an innovative grid to evaluate the quality of clinical records / Guzzo, Anna Santa; Tecca, Mario; Marinelli, Enrico; Palazzo, Caterina; Ursillo, Paolo; Bontempi, Claudio; Nezza, Arianna Di; Sposato, DOMENICA PATRIZIA; Ferro, Giuseppe; Lombardi, ANNA MARIA; Allocca, Amalia; DE GIUSTI, Maria. - In: SENSES & SCIENCES. - ISSN 2284-2489. - ELETTRONICO. - 2:4(2015), pp. 120-125. [doi: 10.14616/sands- 2015-4-120125]

Malpractice and patient safety descriptors: an innovative grid to evaluate the quality of clinical records

GUZZO, Anna Santa
;
TECCA, Mario;MARINELLI, Enrico;PALAZZO, CATERINA;URSILLO, PAOLO;BONTEMPI, CLAUDIO;SPOSATO, DOMENICA PATRIZIA;FERRO, GIUSEPPE;LOMBARDI, ANNA MARIA;DE GIUSTI, Maria
2015

Abstract

Introduction: The medical record contains all the health information related to the patient’s clinical condition and its evolution during hospitalization. It was defined by the Italian Ministry of Health in 1992 as "The information tool designed to record all relevant demographic and clinical information about a patient during a single episode of hospitalization". The documents and information in a Medical Record must meet the following criteria: traceability, clarity, accuracy, authenticity, pertinence and completeness. The objectives of our study was to develop a tool capable of assessing the quality of the clinical record and pointed the critical point at the Organizational, Technical - Professional, Managerial level. Methods: To evaluate the quality of the medical documentation, we created an assessment grid composed of 4 sections with a total of 92 criteria. This grid was tested on 200 medical records that were randomly selected from 25 (18 medical and 7 surgical) wards of a teaching hospital in Rome. Results: The grid contains 4 sections. The first part regards administrative and clinical data; the second assesses the quality of hospital stay and surgical/invasive procedures; the third part is concerned with the discharge of the patient and the fourth aims to identify the presence of advisory reports given to the patient. This grid has been validated to verify internal consistency with Cronbach's Alpha = 0,743. Conclusions: Medical records were analyzed using a validated tool with grids to identify critical issues in care activities. Weaknesses in the system were identified in order to improve planning. The sample testing also in terms of ‘self-assessment' represents a tool to introduce activities to improve safety and quality of care, greatly reducing the costs of litigation.
2015
malpractice; medical records; risk assessment, quality care
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Malpractice and patient safety descriptors: an innovative grid to evaluate the quality of clinical records / Guzzo, Anna Santa; Tecca, Mario; Marinelli, Enrico; Palazzo, Caterina; Ursillo, Paolo; Bontempi, Claudio; Nezza, Arianna Di; Sposato, DOMENICA PATRIZIA; Ferro, Giuseppe; Lombardi, ANNA MARIA; Allocca, Amalia; DE GIUSTI, Maria. - In: SENSES & SCIENCES. - ISSN 2284-2489. - ELETTRONICO. - 2:4(2015), pp. 120-125. [doi: 10.14616/sands- 2015-4-120125]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Guzzo_Malpractice_2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 213.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
213.8 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/960161
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact