We study the short-term price behavior of Phase 2 EU emission allowances. We model returns and volatility dynamics, and we demonstrate that a standard ARMAX-GARCH framework is inadequate for this modeling and that the gaussianity assumption is rejected due to a number of outliers. To improve the fitness of the model, we combine the underlying price process with an additive stochastic jump process. We improve the model's performance by introducing a time-varying jump probability that is explained by two variables: the daily relative change in the volume of transactions and the European Commission's announcements regarding the supply of permits. We show that (i) sharp increases in volume have led to increased volatility during the April 2005–December 2007 period but not for the period beginning in January 2008, and (ii) announcements induce jumps in the process that tend to increase volatility across both periods. Thus, authorities face a trade off between disseminating information effectively and promoting market stability.

Understanding volatility dynamics in the EU-ETS market / Eugenia Sanin, María; Violante, Francesco; Mansanet Bataller, María. - In: ENERGY POLICY. - ISSN 0301-4215. - STAMPA. - 82:1(2015), pp. 321-331. [10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.024]

Understanding volatility dynamics in the EU-ETS market

VIOLANTE, FRANCESCO;
2015

Abstract

We study the short-term price behavior of Phase 2 EU emission allowances. We model returns and volatility dynamics, and we demonstrate that a standard ARMAX-GARCH framework is inadequate for this modeling and that the gaussianity assumption is rejected due to a number of outliers. To improve the fitness of the model, we combine the underlying price process with an additive stochastic jump process. We improve the model's performance by introducing a time-varying jump probability that is explained by two variables: the daily relative change in the volume of transactions and the European Commission's announcements regarding the supply of permits. We show that (i) sharp increases in volume have led to increased volatility during the April 2005–December 2007 period but not for the period beginning in January 2008, and (ii) announcements induce jumps in the process that tend to increase volatility across both periods. Thus, authorities face a trade off between disseminating information effectively and promoting market stability.
2015
Carbon emission trading; EU ETS; EUA market; Garch model; Normal mixture; Energy (all); Management; Monitoring, Policy and Law
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Understanding volatility dynamics in the EU-ETS market / Eugenia Sanin, María; Violante, Francesco; Mansanet Bataller, María. - In: ENERGY POLICY. - ISSN 0301-4215. - STAMPA. - 82:1(2015), pp. 321-331. [10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.024]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Violante_Understanding-volatility_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 557.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
557.74 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/958635
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 72
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 68
social impact