To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10cm in length and 0.5cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25N at 0.1Hz for 10cycles and then a load to failure test at 20mm/min. FINDINGS: Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy. INTERPRETATION: Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd. KEYWORDS: Anterolateral ligament; Biomechanics; Gracilis tendon; Ileotibial band

Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: a biomechanical study / Monaco, Edoardo; Lanzetti, R. M; Fabbri, M.; Redler, Andrea; DE CARLI, Angelo; Ferretti, Andrea. - In: CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS. - ISSN 0268-0033. - STAMPA. - 44:(2017), pp. 99-103. [10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.013]

Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: a biomechanical study

MONACO, Edoardo;REDLER, ANDREA;DE CARLI, ANGELO;FERRETTI, Andrea
2017

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10cm in length and 0.5cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25N at 0.1Hz for 10cycles and then a load to failure test at 20mm/min. FINDINGS: Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy. INTERPRETATION: Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd. KEYWORDS: Anterolateral ligament; Biomechanics; Gracilis tendon; Ileotibial band
2017
anterolateral ligament; biomechanics; gracilis tendon; Ileotibial band; biophysics; orthopedics and sports medicine
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: a biomechanical study / Monaco, Edoardo; Lanzetti, R. M; Fabbri, M.; Redler, Andrea; DE CARLI, Angelo; Ferretti, Andrea. - In: CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS. - ISSN 0268-0033. - STAMPA. - 44:(2017), pp. 99-103. [10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.013]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Monaco_Anterolateral_2017.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 472.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
472.87 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/957273
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact