During decisions, animals balance goal achievement and effort management. Despite physical exercise and fatigue significantly affecting the levels of effort that an animal exerts to obtain a reward, their role in effort-based choice and the underlying neurochemistry are incompletely known. In particular, it is unclear whether fatigue influences decision (cost-benefit) strategies flexibly or only post-decision action execution and learning. To answer this question, we trained mice on a T-maze task in which they chose between a high-cost, high-reward arm (HR), which included a barrier, and a low-cost, low-reward arm (LR), with no barrier. The animals were parametrically fatigued immediately before the behavioural tasks by running on a treadmill. We report a sharp choice reversal, from the HR to LR arm, at 80% of their peak workload (PW), which was temporary and specific, as the mice returned to choose the HC when the animals were successively tested at 60% PW or in a two-barrier task. These rapid reversals are signatures of flexible choice. We also observed increased subcortical dopamine levels in fatigued mice: a marker of individual bias to use model-based control in humans. Our results indicate that fatigue levels can be incorporated in flexible cost-benefits computations that improve foraging efficiency.

Fatigue modulates dopamine availability and promotes flexible choice reversals during decision making / Iodice, P; Ferrante, C; Brunetti, L.; Cabib, Simona; Protasi, F.; Walton, M. E.; Pezzulo, G.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - ELETTRONICO. - (2017). [10.1038/s41598-017-00561-6]

Fatigue modulates dopamine availability and promotes flexible choice reversals during decision making

CABIB, Simona;
2017

Abstract

During decisions, animals balance goal achievement and effort management. Despite physical exercise and fatigue significantly affecting the levels of effort that an animal exerts to obtain a reward, their role in effort-based choice and the underlying neurochemistry are incompletely known. In particular, it is unclear whether fatigue influences decision (cost-benefit) strategies flexibly or only post-decision action execution and learning. To answer this question, we trained mice on a T-maze task in which they chose between a high-cost, high-reward arm (HR), which included a barrier, and a low-cost, low-reward arm (LR), with no barrier. The animals were parametrically fatigued immediately before the behavioural tasks by running on a treadmill. We report a sharp choice reversal, from the HR to LR arm, at 80% of their peak workload (PW), which was temporary and specific, as the mice returned to choose the HC when the animals were successively tested at 60% PW or in a two-barrier task. These rapid reversals are signatures of flexible choice. We also observed increased subcortical dopamine levels in fatigued mice: a marker of individual bias to use model-based control in humans. Our results indicate that fatigue levels can be incorporated in flexible cost-benefits computations that improve foraging efficiency.
2017
cognitive neuroscience; decision making; dopamine
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Fatigue modulates dopamine availability and promotes flexible choice reversals during decision making / Iodice, P; Ferrante, C; Brunetti, L.; Cabib, Simona; Protasi, F.; Walton, M. E.; Pezzulo, G.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - ELETTRONICO. - (2017). [10.1038/s41598-017-00561-6]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Iodice_ Fatigue-modulates-dopamine_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.3 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/948375
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact