This paper considers the differences between institutional and 'ad hoc' arbitration methods, and the advantages and disadvantages of each. The purpose of this paper is not to determine what is the better option, ad hoc or institutional arbitration as this will be dependent upon the parties themselves, the nature of the contractual relationship and the dispute itself. The func- tioning of the ad hoc and institutional arbitration models determine the nature of the disputes which can be arbitrated by them. The success and efficiency of the systems in consonance to the objectives of arbitration rely heavily on the implementation and application of the prin- ciples of ad hoc and institutional arbitration.

Dispute resolution through ad hoc and institutional arbitration / Aliaj, Edlira. - In: ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, ADMINISTRATION, LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 2410-3918. - ELETTRONICO. - 2:2(2016), pp. 241-250.

Dispute resolution through ad hoc and institutional arbitration

ALIAJ, EDLIRA
2016

Abstract

This paper considers the differences between institutional and 'ad hoc' arbitration methods, and the advantages and disadvantages of each. The purpose of this paper is not to determine what is the better option, ad hoc or institutional arbitration as this will be dependent upon the parties themselves, the nature of the contractual relationship and the dispute itself. The func- tioning of the ad hoc and institutional arbitration models determine the nature of the disputes which can be arbitrated by them. The success and efficiency of the systems in consonance to the objectives of arbitration rely heavily on the implementation and application of the prin- ciples of ad hoc and institutional arbitration.
2016
arbitration; ad hoc arbitration; institutional arbitration; disputes; UNCITRAL
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Dispute resolution through ad hoc and institutional arbitration / Aliaj, Edlira. - In: ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, ADMINISTRATION, LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 2410-3918. - ELETTRONICO. - 2:2(2016), pp. 241-250.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Aliaj_Dispute_2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 381.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
381.28 kB Adobe PDF
Aliaj_Dispute-Copertina-Indice_2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.86 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/948312
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact