Objective Three professional devices for office blood pressure (BP) measurement, using three different algorithms to determine BP, were evaluated according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. The Omron BP10 uses the oscillometric method, the Omron HBP T105 (module HBP-M3600) uses the smart inflation mode and high-speed measurement and the Pic Indolor Professional check is a hybrid sphygmomanometer. Methods The International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension is divided into two phases and includes a total number of 33 participants on whom the validation is performed. In each study and for each participant, four BP measurements were performed simultaneously by two observers using mercury sphygmomanometers alternately with three measurements by the tested device. The difference between the observers and the device BP values was calculated for each measure. The 99 pairs BP differences were classified into three categories (— 5, — 10 and — 15 mmHg). Results All three tested devices passed the first and the second phase of the validation process. The mean differences between the device and mercury readings were S0.02W3.7 and S2.2W3.9mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively, for the Omron BP10 device; 1.5W5.7 and S0.6W3.8mmHg for the Omron HBP T105 device; and S0.6W1.7 and S0.4W1.5mmHg for the Pic Indolor Professional device. Conclusion Readings of the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Professional check, fulfill the criteria of the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Therefore, these devices can be used in the clinic.

Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressare accordino to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional / Germano', Giuseppe Italo Walter; J., Khabouth; J., Mattar; V., Pecchioli; R., Asmar. - In: JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION. - ISSN 0263-6352. - STAMPA. - 28:(2010), pp. 452-458. [10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283340c2b]

Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressare accordino to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional

GERMANO', Giuseppe Italo Walter;
2010

Abstract

Objective Three professional devices for office blood pressure (BP) measurement, using three different algorithms to determine BP, were evaluated according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. The Omron BP10 uses the oscillometric method, the Omron HBP T105 (module HBP-M3600) uses the smart inflation mode and high-speed measurement and the Pic Indolor Professional check is a hybrid sphygmomanometer. Methods The International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension is divided into two phases and includes a total number of 33 participants on whom the validation is performed. In each study and for each participant, four BP measurements were performed simultaneously by two observers using mercury sphygmomanometers alternately with three measurements by the tested device. The difference between the observers and the device BP values was calculated for each measure. The 99 pairs BP differences were classified into three categories (— 5, — 10 and — 15 mmHg). Results All three tested devices passed the first and the second phase of the validation process. The mean differences between the device and mercury readings were S0.02W3.7 and S2.2W3.9mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively, for the Omron BP10 device; 1.5W5.7 and S0.6W3.8mmHg for the Omron HBP T105 device; and S0.6W1.7 and S0.4W1.5mmHg for the Pic Indolor Professional device. Conclusion Readings of the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Professional check, fulfill the criteria of the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Therefore, these devices can be used in the clinic.
2010
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressare accordino to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional / Germano', Giuseppe Italo Walter; J., Khabouth; J., Mattar; V., Pecchioli; R., Asmar. - In: JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION. - ISSN 0263-6352. - STAMPA. - 28:(2010), pp. 452-458. [10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283340c2b]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/94025
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact