Purpose: To test the potential ability of mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) in discriminating between PCa of grade group (GG) 1&2, and GGs ≥ 3. Material and methods: Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) experiments at 3T in a cohort of 38 patients with PCa (fifty lesions in total) were performed, by using different diffusion weights (b values) up to 2500 s/mm2. Gleason score (GS) and GG data were correlated with DTI parameters (MD and FA) estimated in PCa. The relation between DTI measures and GS was tested by the linear correlation analysis (Pearson's coefficient). One-way analysis of variance to check the statistical significance of the difference between GG 1&2 and GGs 3, 4, 5, ≥3 was used. Results were reported for each of the three b-values ranges: 0–800 s/mm2, 0–1500 s/mm2, 0–2500 s/mm2. Results: A negative correlation was found between MD and GS. The highest linear correlation was observed when the fit was performed with data acquired in the b-values range 0–2500 s/mm2. MD values were significantly different between GG 1&2 and GG = 3 and between GG 1&2 and GG ≥3. Moreover this difference is better defined when high b values (higher than b = 800 s/mm2) are used. The specificity, sensitivity and accuracy in the discrimination between GG 1&2 and GG = 3 were: 90%, 66.7% and 82.4%, respectively when MD was estimated in the b-values range 0–2500 s/mm2 while these values were 85%, 58.3% and 78.4% when MD was estimated in the b-values range 0–800 s/mm2. Conversely FA did not discriminate between GG 1&2 and GG ≥3, at any investigated b-values range. Conclusion: This study suggests that MD estimation in PCa, obtained from DTI acquired at high b-values, can contribute to the diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer while FA is not a useful parameter for this purpose.

Mean diffusivity discriminates between prostate cancer with grade group 1&2 and grade groups equal to or greater than 3 / Nezzo, M.; DI TRANI, maria giovanna; Caporale, Alessandra; Miano, R.; Mauriello, A.; Bove, P.; Capuani, Silvia; Manenti, G.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 1872-7727. - STAMPA. - 85:(2016), pp. 1794-1801. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.001]

Mean diffusivity discriminates between prostate cancer with grade group 1&2 and grade groups equal to or greater than 3

DI TRANI, maria giovanna;CAPORALE, ALESSANDRA;CAPUANI, Silvia;
2016

Abstract

Purpose: To test the potential ability of mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) in discriminating between PCa of grade group (GG) 1&2, and GGs ≥ 3. Material and methods: Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) experiments at 3T in a cohort of 38 patients with PCa (fifty lesions in total) were performed, by using different diffusion weights (b values) up to 2500 s/mm2. Gleason score (GS) and GG data were correlated with DTI parameters (MD and FA) estimated in PCa. The relation between DTI measures and GS was tested by the linear correlation analysis (Pearson's coefficient). One-way analysis of variance to check the statistical significance of the difference between GG 1&2 and GGs 3, 4, 5, ≥3 was used. Results were reported for each of the three b-values ranges: 0–800 s/mm2, 0–1500 s/mm2, 0–2500 s/mm2. Results: A negative correlation was found between MD and GS. The highest linear correlation was observed when the fit was performed with data acquired in the b-values range 0–2500 s/mm2. MD values were significantly different between GG 1&2 and GG = 3 and between GG 1&2 and GG ≥3. Moreover this difference is better defined when high b values (higher than b = 800 s/mm2) are used. The specificity, sensitivity and accuracy in the discrimination between GG 1&2 and GG = 3 were: 90%, 66.7% and 82.4%, respectively when MD was estimated in the b-values range 0–2500 s/mm2 while these values were 85%, 58.3% and 78.4% when MD was estimated in the b-values range 0–800 s/mm2. Conversely FA did not discriminate between GG 1&2 and GG ≥3, at any investigated b-values range. Conclusion: This study suggests that MD estimation in PCa, obtained from DTI acquired at high b-values, can contribute to the diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer while FA is not a useful parameter for this purpose.
2016
Prostate cancer; grade group; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; diffusion tensor imaging; MD.
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Mean diffusivity discriminates between prostate cancer with grade group 1&2 and grade groups equal to or greater than 3 / Nezzo, M.; DI TRANI, maria giovanna; Caporale, Alessandra; Miano, R.; Mauriello, A.; Bove, P.; Capuani, Silvia; Manenti, G.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 1872-7727. - STAMPA. - 85:(2016), pp. 1794-1801. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.001]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Nezzo_Mean diffusivity_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.2 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/934230
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact