Abstract concepts (“freedom”) differ from concrete ones (“cat”), as they do not have a bounded, identifiable, and clearly perceivable referent. The way in which abstract concepts are represented has recently become a topic of intense debate, especially because of the spread of the embodied approach to cognition. Within this framework concepts derive their meaning from the same perception, motor, and emotional systems that are involved in online interaction with the world. Most of the evidence in favor of this view, however, has been gathered with regard to concrete concepts. Given the relevance of abstract concepts for higher-order cognition, we argue that being able to explain how they are represented is a crucial challenge that any theory of cognition needs to address. The aim of this article is to offer a critical review of the latest theories on abstract concepts, focusing on embodied ones. Starting with theories that question the distinction between abstract and concrete concepts, we review theories claiming thatabstractconceptsaregroundedinmetaphors,insituationsandintrospection,andinemotion.Wethen introduce multiple representation theories, according to which abstract concepts evoke both sensorimotor and linguistic information. We argue that the most promising approach is given by multiple representation views that combine an embodied perspective with the recognition of the importance of linguistic and social experience. We conclude by discussing whether or not a single theoretical framework might be able to explain all different varieties of abstract concepts.

The challenge of abstract concepts / Borghi, Anna M; Binkofski, Ferdinand; Castelfranchi, Cristiano; Cimatti, Felice; Scorolli, Claudia; Tummolini, Luca. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN. - ISSN 0033-2909. - STAMPA. - 143:3(2017), pp. 263-292. [10.1037/bul0000089]

The challenge of abstract concepts

Borghi, Anna M;
2017

Abstract

Abstract concepts (“freedom”) differ from concrete ones (“cat”), as they do not have a bounded, identifiable, and clearly perceivable referent. The way in which abstract concepts are represented has recently become a topic of intense debate, especially because of the spread of the embodied approach to cognition. Within this framework concepts derive their meaning from the same perception, motor, and emotional systems that are involved in online interaction with the world. Most of the evidence in favor of this view, however, has been gathered with regard to concrete concepts. Given the relevance of abstract concepts for higher-order cognition, we argue that being able to explain how they are represented is a crucial challenge that any theory of cognition needs to address. The aim of this article is to offer a critical review of the latest theories on abstract concepts, focusing on embodied ones. Starting with theories that question the distinction between abstract and concrete concepts, we review theories claiming thatabstractconceptsaregroundedinmetaphors,insituationsandintrospection,andinemotion.Wethen introduce multiple representation theories, according to which abstract concepts evoke both sensorimotor and linguistic information. We argue that the most promising approach is given by multiple representation views that combine an embodied perspective with the recognition of the importance of linguistic and social experience. We conclude by discussing whether or not a single theoretical framework might be able to explain all different varieties of abstract concepts.
2017
abstract concepts; abstract words; categorization; embodied cognition; language acquisition; psychology (all); history and philosophy of science
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The challenge of abstract concepts / Borghi, Anna M; Binkofski, Ferdinand; Castelfranchi, Cristiano; Cimatti, Felice; Scorolli, Claudia; Tummolini, Luca. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN. - ISSN 0033-2909. - STAMPA. - 143:3(2017), pp. 263-292. [10.1037/bul0000089]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Borghie_Challenge_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 661.19 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
661.19 kB Adobe PDF
Borghi_Challenge_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 418.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
418.63 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/931854
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 79
  • Scopus 329
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 272
social impact