Pressure differential systems offer the facility of maintaining tenable conditions in protected spaces, for example escape routes, firefighting access routes, firefighting shafts, lobbies, staircases, and other areas that require to be kept free of smoke. The aim is to establish a pressure gradient (and thus an airflow pattern) with the protected escape space at the highest pressure and the pressure progressively decreasing in areas away from the escape routes. Smoke control using pressure differentials generally are limited to the protection of enclosed spaces adjacent to spaces smoke logged in the event of a fire. This research highlights some fundamental aspects on the pressurization and depressurization transient and the airflow field development through experiments and numerical simulations, with a focus on the pressure variation inside a lobby space and on the velocity profile across an open door in a pressurized lobby.

Comparison between experimental tests and computer models of a smokeproof enclosure safety vestibule / Ponziani, Fabio Alaimo; Gai, Giordana; Cancelliere, Piergiacomo; Tinaburri, Alberto; De Bartolomeo, Domenico; Mazzaro, Michele; Caciolai, Mauro; Cartapati, Enzo. - STAMPA. - 2:(2016), pp. 1289-1296. (Intervento presentato al convegno Interflam 2016 - 14th International Fire Science and Engineering Conference tenutosi a Royal Holloway College, University of London, UK nel 4-6 july 2016).

Comparison between experimental tests and computer models of a smokeproof enclosure safety vestibule

GAI, GIORDANA;CARTAPATI, Enzo
2016

Abstract

Pressure differential systems offer the facility of maintaining tenable conditions in protected spaces, for example escape routes, firefighting access routes, firefighting shafts, lobbies, staircases, and other areas that require to be kept free of smoke. The aim is to establish a pressure gradient (and thus an airflow pattern) with the protected escape space at the highest pressure and the pressure progressively decreasing in areas away from the escape routes. Smoke control using pressure differentials generally are limited to the protection of enclosed spaces adjacent to spaces smoke logged in the event of a fire. This research highlights some fundamental aspects on the pressurization and depressurization transient and the airflow field development through experiments and numerical simulations, with a focus on the pressure variation inside a lobby space and on the velocity profile across an open door in a pressurized lobby.
2016
Interflam 2016 - 14th International Fire Science and Engineering Conference
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Comparison between experimental tests and computer models of a smokeproof enclosure safety vestibule / Ponziani, Fabio Alaimo; Gai, Giordana; Cancelliere, Piergiacomo; Tinaburri, Alberto; De Bartolomeo, Domenico; Mazzaro, Michele; Caciolai, Mauro; Cartapati, Enzo. - STAMPA. - 2:(2016), pp. 1289-1296. (Intervento presentato al convegno Interflam 2016 - 14th International Fire Science and Engineering Conference tenutosi a Royal Holloway College, University of London, UK nel 4-6 july 2016).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/928913
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact