Improving energy efficiency in public buildings is one of the main challenges for a sustainable requalification of energy issues and a consequent reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This paper aims to provide preliminary information about economic costs and energy consumption reductions (benefits) of some considered interventions in existing public buildings. Methods include an analysis of some feasible interventions in four selected public buildings. Energy efficiency improvements have been assessed for each feasible intervention. The difference of the building global energy performance index (EPgl) has been assessed before and after each intervention. Economic costs of each intervention have been estimated by averaging the amount demanded by different companies for the same intervention. Results obtained show economic costs and the EPgl percentage improvement for each intervention, highlighting and allowing for the comparison of energy consumption reduction and relative economic costs. The research results come from data gathered from four public buildings, and as such they could not be used to generically identify cost-beneficial energy efficiency interventions for every context or building type. However, the data reveals useful cost based considerations for selecting energy efficiency interventions in other public buildings.

Cost-benefit analysis for energy management in public buildings: four italian case studies / ASTIASO GARCIA, Davide; Cumo, Fabrizio; Tiberi, Mariagrazia; Sforzini, Valentina; Piras, Giuseppe. - In: ENERGIES. - ISSN 1996-1073. - ELETTRONICO. - 9:7(2016), pp. 1-17. [10.3390/en9070522]

Cost-benefit analysis for energy management in public buildings: four italian case studies

ASTIASO GARCIA, Davide;CUMO, Fabrizio;TIBERI, MARIAGRAZIA;SFORZINI, VALENTINA;PIRAS, GIUSEPPE
2016

Abstract

Improving energy efficiency in public buildings is one of the main challenges for a sustainable requalification of energy issues and a consequent reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This paper aims to provide preliminary information about economic costs and energy consumption reductions (benefits) of some considered interventions in existing public buildings. Methods include an analysis of some feasible interventions in four selected public buildings. Energy efficiency improvements have been assessed for each feasible intervention. The difference of the building global energy performance index (EPgl) has been assessed before and after each intervention. Economic costs of each intervention have been estimated by averaging the amount demanded by different companies for the same intervention. Results obtained show economic costs and the EPgl percentage improvement for each intervention, highlighting and allowing for the comparison of energy consumption reduction and relative economic costs. The research results come from data gathered from four public buildings, and as such they could not be used to generically identify cost-beneficial energy efficiency interventions for every context or building type. However, the data reveals useful cost based considerations for selecting energy efficiency interventions in other public buildings.
2016
building envelope; cost-benefit analysis; energy demand savings; energy efficiency; geothermal plant; public buildings; retrofitting; thermostatic valves; trigeneration plant; computer science
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Cost-benefit analysis for energy management in public buildings: four italian case studies / ASTIASO GARCIA, Davide; Cumo, Fabrizio; Tiberi, Mariagrazia; Sforzini, Valentina; Piras, Giuseppe. - In: ENERGIES. - ISSN 1996-1073. - ELETTRONICO. - 9:7(2016), pp. 1-17. [10.3390/en9070522]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Astiaso_Garcia-Cost_Benefit_2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.69 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/924873
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact