Do we need another heart failure biomarker. focus on soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2)

If sST2 indeed turns into the HbA1c of heart failure, its value should increase exponentially in our management of patients with heart failure. Serial sST2 levels should allow us to titrate therapy and monitor the clinical state of the patient. In addition, since sST2 is such a strong marker of the risk of death, it would not be surprising to see a level be used to make decisions when patients are on the cusp of such therapies as ICD, CRT, CardioMems implantation and even left ventricular assist devices. A discussion about the use of biomarkers would not be complete without mentioning the issue of surrogates for determining the therapy effectiveness of some of the newer heart failure drugs. Novartis’s EntrestoVR , the brand name for its recently CE marked and FDA approved ARNI1 drug (previously known as LCZ696) and Servier’s ivabradine drug CorlanorVR (marketed by Amgen in the USA), also CE marked and FDA approved, while offering exciting potential benefits to heart failure patients—even being hailed ‘game-changer’ drugs by some—raises the thorny issue of cost vs. benefit. These new drugs are several times the cost of the generics that have become the mainstay of heart failure treatment, i.e. ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs), beta-blockers, etc. Pushback is therefore expected from payers. Because sST2 changes rapidly with the underlying condition of the patient, is not affected by normal confounding factors, and has a single cut point, it may be ideally suited to help clinicians determine if these newer mediations are effective for each patient, are improving quality of life, and whether dosing needs to be titrated or changed. The new reality of heart failure care is that while more treatment options have opened up, which can literally be a lifesaver for millions of patients, the burden on healthcare systems has skyrocketed. Biomarkers, and particularly sST2, could offer physicians and payers a way to bring treatment down to an individual patient level, providing?