Within the PROINDUSTRY project a Performance-based analysis framework is defined for seismic assessment of industrial structures, based on Nonlinear Response History Analysis (NL RHA) using in particular the Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) method. This paper describes the choice of the PBEE and IDA analysis methods starting from an overview of state-of-the-art methods. The choice is analyzed in relation to: analysis goals for the selected case studies (design-based vs. risk-based), availability of databases/tools for hazard analysis and GMs selection, accuracy of criteria to scale and match GMs to a target spectrum (UHS, CMS, etc.) and treatment of record components. Three possible approaches of GMs selection are described and analyzed: (1) UHS-coherent Unscaled (Design), (2) UHS-coherent GMs scaled to Sa(T1) (Risk/Loss), (3) CMS-coherent GMs scaled to Sa(T1), (Risk/Loss). Within the scopes of PROINDUSTRY, the approach (1) is proposed, as a tradeoff between simplicity of conventional PBEE design methods and probabilistic robustness for a heterogeneous portfolio of structures/facilities.
Performance-based nonlinear response history analysis framework for the "PROINDUSTRY" project case studies / Faggella, Marco; Laguardia, Raffaele; Gigliotti, Rosario; Morelli, Francesco; Braga, Franco; Salvatore, Walter. - 3:(2016), pp. 5912-5925. (Intervento presentato al convegno 7th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, ECCOMAS Congress 2016 tenutosi a Crete Island; Greece nel 2016).
Performance-based nonlinear response history analysis framework for the "PROINDUSTRY" project case studies
FAGGELLA, Marco
;LAGUARDIA, RAFFAELE;GIGLIOTTI, Rosario;
2016
Abstract
Within the PROINDUSTRY project a Performance-based analysis framework is defined for seismic assessment of industrial structures, based on Nonlinear Response History Analysis (NL RHA) using in particular the Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) method. This paper describes the choice of the PBEE and IDA analysis methods starting from an overview of state-of-the-art methods. The choice is analyzed in relation to: analysis goals for the selected case studies (design-based vs. risk-based), availability of databases/tools for hazard analysis and GMs selection, accuracy of criteria to scale and match GMs to a target spectrum (UHS, CMS, etc.) and treatment of record components. Three possible approaches of GMs selection are described and analyzed: (1) UHS-coherent Unscaled (Design), (2) UHS-coherent GMs scaled to Sa(T1) (Risk/Loss), (3) CMS-coherent GMs scaled to Sa(T1), (Risk/Loss). Within the scopes of PROINDUSTRY, the approach (1) is proposed, as a tradeoff between simplicity of conventional PBEE design methods and probabilistic robustness for a heterogeneous portfolio of structures/facilities.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Faggella_Performance_2016.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: PBNL response ECCOMAS 2016
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
715.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
715.16 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.