Even though Italy is still struggling to establish equal rights and access to assisted reproduction techniques for sexual minorities, an increasing number of lesbian women and gay men are now becoming parents. There are only a few studies that have evaluated coparenting in same-sex couples. However, these addressed adoptive couples and not the lesbian and gay parent families through donor insemination or surrogacy, respectively. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Coparenting Scale-Revised and its relationship with dyadic adjustment, discipline management, and internalized sexual stigma in Italian same-sex-planned families. The factor structure showed a satisfactory internal consistency and criterion validity with correlates of coparenting behaviours. While Family Integrity factor was confirmed, Disparagement and Reprimand dimensions collapsed into Conflict factor. Non-genetic parents showed lower levels of conflict than genetic parents. Most importantly, coparenting emerged as a significant function not shaped by gender, but influenced by parental status and internalized sexual stigma.

Same-sex parent families in Italy: Validation of the Coparenting Scale-Revised for lesbian mothers and gay fathers / Carone, Nicola; Baiocco, Roberto; Ioverno, Salvatore; Chirumbolo, Antonio; Lingiardi, Vittorio. - In: THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1740-5629. - ELETTRONICO. - 14:3(2017), pp. 367-379. [10.1080/17405629.2016.1205478]

Same-sex parent families in Italy: Validation of the Coparenting Scale-Revised for lesbian mothers and gay fathers

CARONE, NICOLA
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
BAIOCCO, ROBERTO
Secondo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
IOVERNO, SALVATORE
Data Curation
;
CHIRUMBOLO, Antonio
Penultimo
Formal Analysis
;
LINGIARDI, Vittorio
Ultimo
Supervision
2017

Abstract

Even though Italy is still struggling to establish equal rights and access to assisted reproduction techniques for sexual minorities, an increasing number of lesbian women and gay men are now becoming parents. There are only a few studies that have evaluated coparenting in same-sex couples. However, these addressed adoptive couples and not the lesbian and gay parent families through donor insemination or surrogacy, respectively. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Coparenting Scale-Revised and its relationship with dyadic adjustment, discipline management, and internalized sexual stigma in Italian same-sex-planned families. The factor structure showed a satisfactory internal consistency and criterion validity with correlates of coparenting behaviours. While Family Integrity factor was confirmed, Disparagement and Reprimand dimensions collapsed into Conflict factor. Non-genetic parents showed lower levels of conflict than genetic parents. Most importantly, coparenting emerged as a significant function not shaped by gender, but influenced by parental status and internalized sexual stigma.
2017
assisted reproduction; child well-being; coparenting; gay father; internalized sexual stigma; lesbian mother
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Same-sex parent families in Italy: Validation of the Coparenting Scale-Revised for lesbian mothers and gay fathers / Carone, Nicola; Baiocco, Roberto; Ioverno, Salvatore; Chirumbolo, Antonio; Lingiardi, Vittorio. - In: THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1740-5629. - ELETTRONICO. - 14:3(2017), pp. 367-379. [10.1080/17405629.2016.1205478]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Carone_Same-sex_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.03 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/909252
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact