Background Genetic tests are becoming increasingly available for clinical decision making, ushering in the era of personalized medicine. However, their implementation in clinical practice must be underpinned by a rigorous evaluation of their actual benefits. For this purpose, several evaluation tools have been developed. The aim of this study is to identify and compare the existing tools for assessments of genetic tests, taking into account their methodology and evaluation criteria. Methods A systematic review of the literature has been carried out through PUBMED, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Knowledge, Google and grey literature sources using the following inclusion criteria: research articles, systematic reviews, documents of eminent scientific societies, government agencies and research organizations focused on evaluation tools for genetic test. A DELPHI survey, undertaken with international experts in Public Health Genomics, will be performed to reach consensus on data extraction. Results Preliminary results consist of 19 tools published between 2000 and 2012 (10 in USA, three in Canada, six in Europe), mostly based on the ACCE model (n.10 tools) and on the HTA model (n.5 tools). Sixteen tools address all types of genetic test, while the others take into account a specific type of genetic test (newborn screening, predictive genetic tests, genetic susceptibility tests). The evaluation criteria adopted by the vast majority of the tools (n.16 tools) are analytic and clinical validity, clinical utility, ethical legal and social issues. At a glance, the evaluation of the economic aspects seems insufficient. Conclusions The comparative analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the retrieved evaluation tools will be the basis for the choice of the most appropriate process of genetic test evaluation that should take into account national and local contexts. Key messages Our preliminary search has retrieved 19 tools for the evaluation of genetic tests, developed in the last fifteen years This systematic review will provide the basis for adapting comprehensive and appropriate processes of genetic test evaluation to the different national and local contexts.

How should genetic tests be evaluated? Preliminary results of a systematic review / Pitini, Erica; DE VITO, Corrado; Marzuillo, Carolina; D'Andrea, Elvira; D'Aguanno, Silvia; Villari, Paolo. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1101-1262. - ELETTRONICO. - 25:suppl. 3(2015), pp. 187-187. (Intervento presentato al convegno 8th European Public Health Conference Health in Europe - from global to local policies, methods and practices tenutosi a Milan, Italy nel 14 - 17 October 2015) [10.1093/eurpub/ckv172.040].

How should genetic tests be evaluated? Preliminary results of a systematic review

PITINI, ERICA;DE VITO, CORRADO;MARZUILLO, CAROLINA;D'ANDREA, ELVIRA;D'AGUANNO, SILVIA;VILLARI, Paolo
2015

Abstract

Background Genetic tests are becoming increasingly available for clinical decision making, ushering in the era of personalized medicine. However, their implementation in clinical practice must be underpinned by a rigorous evaluation of their actual benefits. For this purpose, several evaluation tools have been developed. The aim of this study is to identify and compare the existing tools for assessments of genetic tests, taking into account their methodology and evaluation criteria. Methods A systematic review of the literature has been carried out through PUBMED, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Knowledge, Google and grey literature sources using the following inclusion criteria: research articles, systematic reviews, documents of eminent scientific societies, government agencies and research organizations focused on evaluation tools for genetic test. A DELPHI survey, undertaken with international experts in Public Health Genomics, will be performed to reach consensus on data extraction. Results Preliminary results consist of 19 tools published between 2000 and 2012 (10 in USA, three in Canada, six in Europe), mostly based on the ACCE model (n.10 tools) and on the HTA model (n.5 tools). Sixteen tools address all types of genetic test, while the others take into account a specific type of genetic test (newborn screening, predictive genetic tests, genetic susceptibility tests). The evaluation criteria adopted by the vast majority of the tools (n.16 tools) are analytic and clinical validity, clinical utility, ethical legal and social issues. At a glance, the evaluation of the economic aspects seems insufficient. Conclusions The comparative analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the retrieved evaluation tools will be the basis for the choice of the most appropriate process of genetic test evaluation that should take into account national and local contexts. Key messages Our preliminary search has retrieved 19 tools for the evaluation of genetic tests, developed in the last fifteen years This systematic review will provide the basis for adapting comprehensive and appropriate processes of genetic test evaluation to the different national and local contexts.
2015
8th European Public Health Conference Health in Europe - from global to local policies, methods and practices
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04d Abstract in atti di convegno
How should genetic tests be evaluated? Preliminary results of a systematic review / Pitini, Erica; DE VITO, Corrado; Marzuillo, Carolina; D'Andrea, Elvira; D'Aguanno, Silvia; Villari, Paolo. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1101-1262. - ELETTRONICO. - 25:suppl. 3(2015), pp. 187-187. (Intervento presentato al convegno 8th European Public Health Conference Health in Europe - from global to local policies, methods and practices tenutosi a Milan, Italy nel 14 - 17 October 2015) [10.1093/eurpub/ckv172.040].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pitini_genetic-tests_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 43.38 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
43.38 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/908800
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact