Older infilled frame R/C structures have several deficiencies as compared to seismic code-conforming structures, inherent to the behavior of the structural elements and interaction between structural and nonstructural components, which should be accounted for an accurate performance assessment. In order to investigate the importance of incorporating the contribution of the infills (typically considered as non-structural members) and their interaction with non-ductile columns in a building structural model, a comprehensive performance based earthquake assessment over a range of hazard levels is carried out through Nonlinear static and Incremental Dynamic Analyses of a 2D frame model incorporating: (1) fiber section axial force-moment interaction, (2) cracking and crushing of the infills and (3) infills-induced shear failure of columns. The analyses are performed on three different common structural configurations: (A) bare frame, (B) uniformly infilled frame, and (C) partially infilled frame (pilotis frame). Results show the importance of correctly accounting for shear failure of columns when modeling the infill-frame interaction, and the influence of the inelastic shear law, opening placement, type of infills, and choice of infill constitutive model.

Seismic performance of older R/C frame structures accounting for infills-induced shear failure of columns / Mohammad, Aslam Faqeer; Faggella, Marco; Gigliotti, Rosario; Spacone, Enrico. - In: ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. - ISSN 0141-0296. - 122:(2016), pp. 1-13. [10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.010]

Seismic performance of older R/C frame structures accounting for infills-induced shear failure of columns

FAGGELLA, Marco
;
GIGLIOTTI, Rosario;
2016

Abstract

Older infilled frame R/C structures have several deficiencies as compared to seismic code-conforming structures, inherent to the behavior of the structural elements and interaction between structural and nonstructural components, which should be accounted for an accurate performance assessment. In order to investigate the importance of incorporating the contribution of the infills (typically considered as non-structural members) and their interaction with non-ductile columns in a building structural model, a comprehensive performance based earthquake assessment over a range of hazard levels is carried out through Nonlinear static and Incremental Dynamic Analyses of a 2D frame model incorporating: (1) fiber section axial force-moment interaction, (2) cracking and crushing of the infills and (3) infills-induced shear failure of columns. The analyses are performed on three different common structural configurations: (A) bare frame, (B) uniformly infilled frame, and (C) partially infilled frame (pilotis frame). Results show the importance of correctly accounting for shear failure of columns when modeling the infill-frame interaction, and the influence of the inelastic shear law, opening placement, type of infills, and choice of infill constitutive model.
2016
Incremental Dynamic Analysis; Infilled RC frame; Older non-ductile buildings; Pushover; Seismic performance assessment; Shear failure; Civil and Structural Engineering
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Seismic performance of older R/C frame structures accounting for infills-induced shear failure of columns / Mohammad, Aslam Faqeer; Faggella, Marco; Gigliotti, Rosario; Spacone, Enrico. - In: ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. - ISSN 0141-0296. - 122:(2016), pp. 1-13. [10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.010]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Mohammad_Seismic_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.57 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.57 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/908779
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact