In this paper, by modeling national and regional research systems as complex systems, we compare the dynamics of their disciplinary profiles using extensive (size dependent) indicators as well as intensive (size independent) average productivity indicators of scientific production. Our preliminary findings show that the differences between the disciplinary profiles among countries in the world is of the same order of magnitude of the differences among European countries, that in turn, is of the same order of magnitude of the dynamics among regions within a country. While additional research (that is in progress) is needed to confirm these findings, we describe the main advantages (features) of our approach and outline its usefulness to support evidence-based policy making.Grant: This work was supported by Elsevier that provided the data within the Elsevier Bibliometric Research Programme (EBRP) for the Project "Assessing the Scientific Performance of Regions and Countries at Disciplinary Level by Means of Robust Nonparametric Methods: New Indicators to Measure Regional and National Scientific Competitiveness".

Comparing the disciplinary profiles of national and regional research systems by extensive and intensive measures / Bongioanni, Irene; Daraio, Cinzia; Moed, Henk F.; Ruocco, Giancarlo. - (2015), pp. 684-696. (Intervento presentato al convegno 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, ISSI 2015 tenutosi a Istanbul; Turkey nel 2015).

Comparing the disciplinary profiles of national and regional research systems by extensive and intensive measures

BONGIOANNI, IRENE
;
DARAIO, CINZIA
;
RUOCCO, Giancarlo
2015

Abstract

In this paper, by modeling national and regional research systems as complex systems, we compare the dynamics of their disciplinary profiles using extensive (size dependent) indicators as well as intensive (size independent) average productivity indicators of scientific production. Our preliminary findings show that the differences between the disciplinary profiles among countries in the world is of the same order of magnitude of the differences among European countries, that in turn, is of the same order of magnitude of the dynamics among regions within a country. While additional research (that is in progress) is needed to confirm these findings, we describe the main advantages (features) of our approach and outline its usefulness to support evidence-based policy making.Grant: This work was supported by Elsevier that provided the data within the Elsevier Bibliometric Research Programme (EBRP) for the Project "Assessing the Scientific Performance of Regions and Countries at Disciplinary Level by Means of Robust Nonparametric Methods: New Indicators to Measure Regional and National Scientific Competitiveness".
2015
15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, ISSI 2015
european countries; evidence-based; nonparametric methods; research programmes; research system; scientific performance; size dependent; size independents
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Comparing the disciplinary profiles of national and regional research systems by extensive and intensive measures / Bongioanni, Irene; Daraio, Cinzia; Moed, Henk F.; Ruocco, Giancarlo. - (2015), pp. 684-696. (Intervento presentato al convegno 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, ISSI 2015 tenutosi a Istanbul; Turkey nel 2015).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Bongiovanni_Comparing _2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.87 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.87 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/908256
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact