Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) represent the most frequent digestive NENs and are increasingly recognized due to expanding indications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Often silent and benign, g-NENs may however be aggressive when sporadic and may sometimes mimic the course of gastric adenocarcinoma. Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (d-NENs) may be sporadic or associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) and present with a functional syndrome (i.e. gastrinoma with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome). Since the last ENETS guidelines [1], new data have become available, especially focusing on g-NENs, while few changes have been reported concerning d-NENs over the last three years. Epidemiology New epidemiological data come from a study performed in Argentina [2], showing that g-NENs and d-NENs represent 6.9 and 2.0% of all digestive NENs, respectively. These data are similar to the SEER data, where g-NENs were found to represent 8.7% of all enteric NENs [3], and quite similar to a recent prospective Austrian study by Niederle et al. [4], where g-NENs represented 5.6% of all digestive NENs. The proportions of g-NENs with respect to the overall NEN rates do vary, however; g-NENs represented 23% of all NENs in the Austrian study compared to 6% in the SEER data, 5% in a Canadian study (Ontario) and 7.4% in a Taiwanese study [4,5,6,7]. These differences underline the need for multicenter prospective studies with long-term analysis to better describe the European epidemiology of these tumors. Clinical and Histological Features Well-differentiated g-NENs may be divided into three types (table 1): type 1 and 2 are ECLomas, due to chronic hypergastrinemia, associated with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, respectively. Type 3 g-NENs are rare and sporadic and are not a consequence of an underlying gastric mucosal abnormality; they are mostly single large lesions with a high metastatic potential and with a high grade (often G3 NEC) [8,9]. Some issues remain open with respect to the above definitions, as well-differentiated g-NENs with a range of grades (G1-G3) not associated with CAG have been described [10,11,12], and thus a further distinction among type 3 g-NENs may be appropriate. Mixed gastric neoplasms as endocrine/exocrine have also been described; 68 cases have been reported in the literature so far, but no data about the patients' survival rate are available [13].
ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Gastroduodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms / DELLE FAVE, G., O'Toole, D., Sundin, A., Taal, B., Ferolla, P., Ramage, J.k., Ferone, D., Ito, T., Weber, W., Zheng Pei, Z., De Herder, W.w., Pascher, A., Ruszniewski, P., Vienna Consensus Conference, P.. - In: NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY. - ISSN 0028-3835. - STAMPA. - 103:2(2016), pp. 119-124. [10.1159/000443168]
ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Gastroduodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
DELLE FAVE, Gianfranco;
2016
Abstract
Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) represent the most frequent digestive NENs and are increasingly recognized due to expanding indications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Often silent and benign, g-NENs may however be aggressive when sporadic and may sometimes mimic the course of gastric adenocarcinoma. Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (d-NENs) may be sporadic or associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) and present with a functional syndrome (i.e. gastrinoma with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome). Since the last ENETS guidelines [1], new data have become available, especially focusing on g-NENs, while few changes have been reported concerning d-NENs over the last three years. Epidemiology New epidemiological data come from a study performed in Argentina [2], showing that g-NENs and d-NENs represent 6.9 and 2.0% of all digestive NENs, respectively. These data are similar to the SEER data, where g-NENs were found to represent 8.7% of all enteric NENs [3], and quite similar to a recent prospective Austrian study by Niederle et al. [4], where g-NENs represented 5.6% of all digestive NENs. The proportions of g-NENs with respect to the overall NEN rates do vary, however; g-NENs represented 23% of all NENs in the Austrian study compared to 6% in the SEER data, 5% in a Canadian study (Ontario) and 7.4% in a Taiwanese study [4,5,6,7]. These differences underline the need for multicenter prospective studies with long-term analysis to better describe the European epidemiology of these tumors. Clinical and Histological Features Well-differentiated g-NENs may be divided into three types (table 1): type 1 and 2 are ECLomas, due to chronic hypergastrinemia, associated with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, respectively. Type 3 g-NENs are rare and sporadic and are not a consequence of an underlying gastric mucosal abnormality; they are mostly single large lesions with a high metastatic potential and with a high grade (often G3 NEC) [8,9]. Some issues remain open with respect to the above definitions, as well-differentiated g-NENs with a range of grades (G1-G3) not associated with CAG have been described [10,11,12], and thus a further distinction among type 3 g-NENs may be appropriate. Mixed gastric neoplasms as endocrine/exocrine have also been described; 68 cases have been reported in the literature so far, but no data about the patients' survival rate are available [13].| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
DelleFave_ENETS-Consensus_2016.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
143.72 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
143.72 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


