BACKGROUND: Thymectomy has been a mainstay in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, but there is no conclusive evidence of its benefit. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus prednisone with prednisone alone. METHODS: We compared extended transsternal thymectomy plus alternate-day prednisone with alternate-day prednisone alone. Patients 18 to 65 years of age who had generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis with a disease duration of less than 5 years were included if they had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinical class II to IV disease (on a scale from I to V, with higher classes indicating more severe disease) and elevated circulating concentrations of acetylcholine-receptor antibody. The primary outcomes were the time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (on a scale from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease) over a 3-year period, as assessed by means of blinded rating, and the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone over a 3-year period. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients underwent randomization between 2006 and 2012 at 36 sites. Patients who underwent thymectomy had a lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score over a 3-year period than those who received prednisone alone (6.15 vs. 8.99, P<0.001); patients in the thymectomy group also had a lower average requirement for alternate-day prednisone (44 mg vs. 60 mg, P<0.001). Fewer patients in the thymectomy group than in the prednisone-only group required immunosuppression with azathioprine (17% vs. 48%, P<0.001) or were hospitalized for exacerbations (9% vs. 37%, P<0.001). The number of patients with treatment-associated complications did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.73), but patients in the thymectomy group had fewer treatment-associated symptoms related to immunosuppressive medications (P<0.001) and lower distress levels related to symptoms (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Thymectomy improved clinical outcomes over a 3-year period in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; MGTX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00294658.)

Randomized trial of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis / Wolfe, G. I; Kaminski, H. J.; Aban, I. B.; Minisman, G.; Kuo, H. C.; Marx, A.; Ströbel, P.; Mazia, C.; Oger, J.; Cea, J. G.; Heckmann, J. M.; Evoli, A.; Nix, W.; Ciafaloni, E.; Antonini, Giovanni; Witoonpanich, R.; King, J. O.; Beydoun, S. R.; Chalk, C. H.; Barboi, A. C.; Amato, A. A.; Shaibani, A. I.; Katirji, B.; Lecky, B. R. F.; Buckley, C.; Vincent, A.; Dias Tosta, E.; Yoshikawa, H.; Waddington Cruz, M.; Pulley, M. T.; Rivner, M. H.; Kostera Pruszczyk, A.; Pascuzzi, R. M.; Jackson, C. E.; Garcia Ramos, G. S.; Verschuuren, J. J. G. M.; Massey, J. M.; Kissel, J. T.; Werneck, L. C.; Benatar, M.; Barohn, R. J.; Tandan, R.; Mozaffar, T.; Conwit, R.; Odenkirchen, J.; Sonett, J. R.; Jaretzki, A.; Newsom Davis, J.; Cutter, G. R.. - In: THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. - ISSN 0028-4793. - STAMPA. - 375:6(2016), pp. 511-522. [10.1056/NEJMoa1602489]

Randomized trial of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis

ANTONINI, Giovanni;
2016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thymectomy has been a mainstay in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, but there is no conclusive evidence of its benefit. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus prednisone with prednisone alone. METHODS: We compared extended transsternal thymectomy plus alternate-day prednisone with alternate-day prednisone alone. Patients 18 to 65 years of age who had generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis with a disease duration of less than 5 years were included if they had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinical class II to IV disease (on a scale from I to V, with higher classes indicating more severe disease) and elevated circulating concentrations of acetylcholine-receptor antibody. The primary outcomes were the time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (on a scale from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease) over a 3-year period, as assessed by means of blinded rating, and the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone over a 3-year period. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients underwent randomization between 2006 and 2012 at 36 sites. Patients who underwent thymectomy had a lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score over a 3-year period than those who received prednisone alone (6.15 vs. 8.99, P<0.001); patients in the thymectomy group also had a lower average requirement for alternate-day prednisone (44 mg vs. 60 mg, P<0.001). Fewer patients in the thymectomy group than in the prednisone-only group required immunosuppression with azathioprine (17% vs. 48%, P<0.001) or were hospitalized for exacerbations (9% vs. 37%, P<0.001). The number of patients with treatment-associated complications did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.73), but patients in the thymectomy group had fewer treatment-associated symptoms related to immunosuppressive medications (P<0.001) and lower distress levels related to symptoms (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Thymectomy improved clinical outcomes over a 3-year period in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; MGTX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00294658.)
2016
adolescent; adult; aged; combined modality therapy; female; glucocorticoids; hospitalization; humans; male; middle aged; myasthenia gravis; prednisone; severity of Illness index; single-blind method; treatment outcome; young adult; thymectomy; medicine
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Randomized trial of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis / Wolfe, G. I; Kaminski, H. J.; Aban, I. B.; Minisman, G.; Kuo, H. C.; Marx, A.; Ströbel, P.; Mazia, C.; Oger, J.; Cea, J. G.; Heckmann, J. M.; Evoli, A.; Nix, W.; Ciafaloni, E.; Antonini, Giovanni; Witoonpanich, R.; King, J. O.; Beydoun, S. R.; Chalk, C. H.; Barboi, A. C.; Amato, A. A.; Shaibani, A. I.; Katirji, B.; Lecky, B. R. F.; Buckley, C.; Vincent, A.; Dias Tosta, E.; Yoshikawa, H.; Waddington Cruz, M.; Pulley, M. T.; Rivner, M. H.; Kostera Pruszczyk, A.; Pascuzzi, R. M.; Jackson, C. E.; Garcia Ramos, G. S.; Verschuuren, J. J. G. M.; Massey, J. M.; Kissel, J. T.; Werneck, L. C.; Benatar, M.; Barohn, R. J.; Tandan, R.; Mozaffar, T.; Conwit, R.; Odenkirchen, J.; Sonett, J. R.; Jaretzki, A.; Newsom Davis, J.; Cutter, G. R.. - In: THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. - ISSN 0028-4793. - STAMPA. - 375:6(2016), pp. 511-522. [10.1056/NEJMoa1602489]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Wolfe_Randomized_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 525.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
525.2 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/905889
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 168
  • Scopus 288
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 486
social impact