This paper reports the investigation on the effect of protective materials on poplar (Populus sp.) wood modifications as consequence of artificial photo-degradation in controlled environment. The novelty of this work is to try to understandwhat happens towood surface under the protective layer. Shellac, beeswax and Linfoil®were tested to compare traditional and novel products generally used for wood. The samples, uncovered and covered by these protective layers,were artificially aged. Colour and chemical modifications due to ageingwere investigated at different time intervals by reflectance spectrophotometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging. The obtained data were elaborated by statistical and chemometric tools in order to verify their significance and to assess the relationship between groups of measurements. The results highlighted that shellac, beeswax and Linfoil® materials have a very low protective effect on wood photo-degradation for long times of exposure, by little reducing the changes of wood components.

Protective behaviour monitoring on wood photo-degradation by spectroscopic techniques coupled with chemometrics / Capobianco, Giuseppe; Calienno, Luca; Pelosi, Claudia; Scacchi, Martina; Bonifazi, Giuseppe; Agresti, Giorgia; Picchio, Rodolfo; Santamaria, Ulderico; Serranti, Silvia; Monaco, Angela Lo. - In: SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA. PART A, MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY. - ISSN 1386-1425. - ELETTRONICO. - 172:(2017), pp. 34-42. [10.1016/j.saa.2016.05.050]

Protective behaviour monitoring on wood photo-degradation by spectroscopic techniques coupled with chemometrics

CAPOBIANCO, GIUSEPPE;BONIFAZI, Giuseppe;SERRANTI, Silvia;
2017

Abstract

This paper reports the investigation on the effect of protective materials on poplar (Populus sp.) wood modifications as consequence of artificial photo-degradation in controlled environment. The novelty of this work is to try to understandwhat happens towood surface under the protective layer. Shellac, beeswax and Linfoil®were tested to compare traditional and novel products generally used for wood. The samples, uncovered and covered by these protective layers,were artificially aged. Colour and chemical modifications due to ageingwere investigated at different time intervals by reflectance spectrophotometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging. The obtained data were elaborated by statistical and chemometric tools in order to verify their significance and to assess the relationship between groups of measurements. The results highlighted that shellac, beeswax and Linfoil® materials have a very low protective effect on wood photo-degradation for long times of exposure, by little reducing the changes of wood components.
2017
chemometry; colour measurements; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; hyperspectral imaging; wood protective
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Protective behaviour monitoring on wood photo-degradation by spectroscopic techniques coupled with chemometrics / Capobianco, Giuseppe; Calienno, Luca; Pelosi, Claudia; Scacchi, Martina; Bonifazi, Giuseppe; Agresti, Giorgia; Picchio, Rodolfo; Santamaria, Ulderico; Serranti, Silvia; Monaco, Angela Lo. - In: SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA. PART A, MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY. - ISSN 1386-1425. - ELETTRONICO. - 172:(2017), pp. 34-42. [10.1016/j.saa.2016.05.050]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Capobianco_Protective-behaviour-monitoring_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: published paper
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.17 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.17 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/905837
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact