In recent years the ability to simulate and predict disproportionate collapse has seen growing interest among the scientific community. This is a challenging matter, since many authors have been dealing with the modeling of progressive collapse, and it is now well-established that such problem requires the use of many different non-standard modeling techniques together with extensive calibration. Despite the many papers in the literature, there is still a lack of methodologies tailored for the quantification of the structural robustness and its acceptable level, which clearly depends on the importance and function of the structure. Further, consideration of Performance Criteria as well as Decision Making Strategies, have to be supported by robust (but also efficient) modeling methods that have to include three-dimensional and geometrical non-linear effects. Some of the previously outlined principles about robustness will be discussed following which the authors present a methodology for taking into account that progressive collapse phenomena are governed not only by the dynamic response of the bays adjacent to the triggering event, but also by the residual plastic resources the structure conserves after the initial damage.

Disproportionate collapse simulations / Fascetti, Alessandro; Kunnath, Sk; Nistico', Nicola. - 847:(2016), pp. 87-94. (Intervento presentato al convegno Advances in Civil and Infrastructure Engineering II tenutosi a Vietri sul Mare - Italy nel June 12,13 2015) [10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.847.87].

Disproportionate collapse simulations

FASCETTI, ALESSANDRO;NISTICO', Nicola
2016

Abstract

In recent years the ability to simulate and predict disproportionate collapse has seen growing interest among the scientific community. This is a challenging matter, since many authors have been dealing with the modeling of progressive collapse, and it is now well-established that such problem requires the use of many different non-standard modeling techniques together with extensive calibration. Despite the many papers in the literature, there is still a lack of methodologies tailored for the quantification of the structural robustness and its acceptable level, which clearly depends on the importance and function of the structure. Further, consideration of Performance Criteria as well as Decision Making Strategies, have to be supported by robust (but also efficient) modeling methods that have to include three-dimensional and geometrical non-linear effects. Some of the previously outlined principles about robustness will be discussed following which the authors present a methodology for taking into account that progressive collapse phenomena are governed not only by the dynamic response of the bays adjacent to the triggering event, but also by the residual plastic resources the structure conserves after the initial damage.
2016
Advances in Civil and Infrastructure Engineering II
collapse; progressive; reinforced concrete; structures
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Disproportionate collapse simulations / Fascetti, Alessandro; Kunnath, Sk; Nistico', Nicola. - 847:(2016), pp. 87-94. (Intervento presentato al convegno Advances in Civil and Infrastructure Engineering II tenutosi a Vietri sul Mare - Italy nel June 12,13 2015) [10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.847.87].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Fascetti_Disproportionate_2016.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 637.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
637.9 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/903024
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact