Governments have committed to conserving17% of terrestrial and10%of marine environments globally, especially “areas of particular importance forbiodiversity” through “ecologically representative” Protected Area (PA) sys-tems or other “area-based conservation measures”, while individual countrieshave committed to conserve 3–50% of their land area. We estimate that PAscurrently cover 14.6% of terrestrial and 2.8% of marine extent, but 59–68%of ecoregions, 77–78% of important sites for biodiversity, and 57% of 25,380species have inadequate coverage. The existing 19.7 million km2terrestrialPA network needs only 3.3 million km2to be added to achieve 17% terres-trial coverage. However, it would require nearly doubling to achieve, cost-efficiently, coverage targets for all countries, ecoregions, important sites, andspecies. Poorer countries have the largest relative shortfalls. Such extensiveand rapid expansion of formal PAs is unlikely to be achievable. Greater fo-cus is therefore needed on alternative approaches, including community- andprivately managed sites and other effective area-based conservation measures.

Shortfalls and Solutions for Meeting National and Global Conservation Area Targets / Stuart HM, B., Martin, C., Robert J., S., Rachel E., S., Jörn PW, S., Mike, H., Graeme M., B., Ariadne, A., Andrew, B., Bastian, B., Thomas M., B., Kent E., C., Mia T., C., John, C., G., F.F., Lincoln DC, F., Richard A., F., Jonas, G., Heather, H., Craig, H., et al.. - In: CONSERVATION LETTERS. - ISSN 1755-263X. - STAMPA. - 8:5(2015), pp. 329-337. [10.1111/conl.12158]

Shortfalls and Solutions for Meeting National and Global Conservation Area Targets

RONDININI, CARLO;
2015

Abstract

Governments have committed to conserving17% of terrestrial and10%of marine environments globally, especially “areas of particular importance forbiodiversity” through “ecologically representative” Protected Area (PA) sys-tems or other “area-based conservation measures”, while individual countrieshave committed to conserve 3–50% of their land area. We estimate that PAscurrently cover 14.6% of terrestrial and 2.8% of marine extent, but 59–68%of ecoregions, 77–78% of important sites for biodiversity, and 57% of 25,380species have inadequate coverage. The existing 19.7 million km2terrestrialPA network needs only 3.3 million km2to be added to achieve 17% terres-trial coverage. However, it would require nearly doubling to achieve, cost-efficiently, coverage targets for all countries, ecoregions, important sites, andspecies. Poorer countries have the largest relative shortfalls. Such extensiveand rapid expansion of formal PAs is unlikely to be achievable. Greater fo-cus is therefore needed on alternative approaches, including community- andprivately managed sites and other effective area-based conservation measures.
2015
Aichi targets; alliance for zero extinction; convention on biological diversity; important bird and biodiversity areas; IUCN red list; Key biodiversity areas; protected areas
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Shortfalls and Solutions for Meeting National and Global Conservation Area Targets / Stuart HM, B., Martin, C., Robert J., S., Rachel E., S., Jörn PW, S., Mike, H., Graeme M., B., Ariadne, A., Andrew, B., Bastian, B., Thomas M., B., Kent E., C., Mia T., C., John, C., G., F.F., Lincoln DC, F., Richard A., F., Jonas, G., Heather, H., Craig, H., et al.. - In: CONSERVATION LETTERS. - ISSN 1755-263X. - STAMPA. - 8:5(2015), pp. 329-337. [10.1111/conl.12158]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Butchart_Shortfalls_2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 604.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
604.96 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/893751
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 414
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 355
social impact