We tested the usefulness of acquiring multicomponent GPR data to detect cracks in a historical building, and to monitor their dynamics, Caused by a slowly and irregularly moving landslide. We used 2 GHz bipolar antennas in a configuration that allows for acquiring g the in-line and cross-line electric field components with x- and y-directed antennas. The 2 x 2 data matrix was collected oil a floor in the building along transects at four different times over a period of one year. The data were processed with a standard 2D scalar algorithm and with the latest 3D single component vector algorithm that corrects for antenna effects. We have implemented a 3D single component vector migration algorithm in a 2.5D sense to produce 2D slices of a 3D vector migration image by applying the algorithm oil line data. This procedure allows for migrating single component line data taking into account all vector effects as well as three-dimensional wave propagation. We show that the 2.5D vector migration images obtained by applying a standard 2D scalar migration images have a Much better in-line resolution than the migration algorithm. The GPR profiles agree with the a priori information about the Structure of the floor. In particular, we detected two different types of anomalies, only a few of which can be due to utilities and to metallic mesh. Some shallower anomalies agree well with the cracks visible oil the filing. suggesting that some cracks call be directly detected Using GPR. Visually there were no changes in the cracks oil the floor and no clear changes in the GPR Clara Could be attributed to possible subsurface changes in the cracks. The variations in the GPR images seemed primarily caused by changes in the coupling of the antennas with the investigated structure (floor) depending oil the season when the measurements were made. For this reason the monitoring aspect Of the survey is not successful. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All lights reserved.
Using multicomponent GPR to monitor cracks in a historical building / Orlando, Luciana; Evert, Slob. - In: JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS. - ISSN 0926-9851. - STAMPA. - 67:4(2009), pp. 327-334. (Intervento presentato al convegno 4th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar tenutosi a Naples, ITALY nel JUN 27-29, 2007) [10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.09.003].
Using multicomponent GPR to monitor cracks in a historical building
ORLANDO, Luciana;
2009
Abstract
We tested the usefulness of acquiring multicomponent GPR data to detect cracks in a historical building, and to monitor their dynamics, Caused by a slowly and irregularly moving landslide. We used 2 GHz bipolar antennas in a configuration that allows for acquiring g the in-line and cross-line electric field components with x- and y-directed antennas. The 2 x 2 data matrix was collected oil a floor in the building along transects at four different times over a period of one year. The data were processed with a standard 2D scalar algorithm and with the latest 3D single component vector algorithm that corrects for antenna effects. We have implemented a 3D single component vector migration algorithm in a 2.5D sense to produce 2D slices of a 3D vector migration image by applying the algorithm oil line data. This procedure allows for migrating single component line data taking into account all vector effects as well as three-dimensional wave propagation. We show that the 2.5D vector migration images obtained by applying a standard 2D scalar migration images have a Much better in-line resolution than the migration algorithm. The GPR profiles agree with the a priori information about the Structure of the floor. In particular, we detected two different types of anomalies, only a few of which can be due to utilities and to metallic mesh. Some shallower anomalies agree well with the cracks visible oil the filing. suggesting that some cracks call be directly detected Using GPR. Visually there were no changes in the cracks oil the floor and no clear changes in the GPR Clara Could be attributed to possible subsurface changes in the cracks. The variations in the GPR images seemed primarily caused by changes in the coupling of the antennas with the investigated structure (floor) depending oil the season when the measurements were made. For this reason the monitoring aspect Of the survey is not successful. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All lights reserved.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.