This paper provides new stylized facts on how support for redistribution in the United Stated has changed over time. Since detecting structural changes in individual attitudes requires long periods of time, we used repeated cross-sectional data from the General Social Survey (GSS) cumulative Datafile that include twenty crosssectional surveys and span a period of over thirty years (1978–2010). A multilevel logistic model with timevarying slopes and two independent levels of variation allowed us to capture temporal patterns net of age and cohort effects. Despite an overall flat trend in demand for redistribution, we find that driving factors in shaping redistributive preferences have changed considerably over time. These changes are little influenced by birth cohort. Specifically, personal income is a strong predictor, with the poor–rich gap increasing over time. Elderly people are more adverse to redistribute than they were in the past. Large changes also characterize the effects of education, ethnic bonds and self-declared party identification. Over time, highly educated people have increased their probability to be in favor of redistribution while the less educated have become less prone. Ethnicity mattered more in the 1970s than in the 2000s and it is increasingly mediated by the political party affiliation of individuals.

Has the attitude of US citizens towards redistribution changed over time? / Pittau, Maria Grazia; Farcomeni, Alessio; Zelli, Roberto. - In: ECONOMIC MODELLING. - ISSN 0264-9993. - STAMPA. - 52:(2016), pp. 714-724. [10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.039]

Has the attitude of US citizens towards redistribution changed over time?

PITTAU, Maria Grazia;FARCOMENI, Alessio;ZELLI, Roberto
2016

Abstract

This paper provides new stylized facts on how support for redistribution in the United Stated has changed over time. Since detecting structural changes in individual attitudes requires long periods of time, we used repeated cross-sectional data from the General Social Survey (GSS) cumulative Datafile that include twenty crosssectional surveys and span a period of over thirty years (1978–2010). A multilevel logistic model with timevarying slopes and two independent levels of variation allowed us to capture temporal patterns net of age and cohort effects. Despite an overall flat trend in demand for redistribution, we find that driving factors in shaping redistributive preferences have changed considerably over time. These changes are little influenced by birth cohort. Specifically, personal income is a strong predictor, with the poor–rich gap increasing over time. Elderly people are more adverse to redistribute than they were in the past. Large changes also characterize the effects of education, ethnic bonds and self-declared party identification. Over time, highly educated people have increased their probability to be in favor of redistribution while the less educated have become less prone. Ethnicity mattered more in the 1970s than in the 2000s and it is increasingly mediated by the political party affiliation of individuals.
2016
demand for redistribution; individual preferences; multilevel logistic with time-varying slopes model; weakly informative priors; economics and econometrics
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Has the attitude of US citizens towards redistribution changed over time? / Pittau, Maria Grazia; Farcomeni, Alessio; Zelli, Roberto. - In: ECONOMIC MODELLING. - ISSN 0264-9993. - STAMPA. - 52:(2016), pp. 714-724. [10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.039]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pittau_Attitude_2016.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Note: Articolo
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 607.09 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
607.09 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/886897
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact