Objective: To compare MRI using perfusion and diffusion techniques with 6-[(18)F]-fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) in the follow-up of low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and to identify the best imaging parameter to differentiate patients with different prognosis. Methods: Between 2010 and 2015, 12 patients with a pathology-proven diagnosis of LGG and MR (with perfusion and diffusion sequences) and a PET study during their follow-up were retrospectively included in our study. Cerebral blood volume (CBV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps on MR studies and PET images were evaluated using a region of interest-based method. All patients were categorized as stable or as having progressive disease at 1-year follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's correlation test and multivariate analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Results: No significant correlations were found between PET parameters [maximum tumour-to-controlateral normal brain ratio (T/Nmax) and tumour-to-striatum ratio] and ADC or relative CBV values measured in both PET hotspot regions and areas of maximum signal alterations. T/Nmax demonstrated a good sensitivity (83%) and specificity (100%) for differentiating two subgroups of patients with different outcomes at 1-year-follow-up (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Perfusion and diffusion MR images provide different information compared with (18)F-FDOPA PET in LGGs during follow-up and therefore, they should be considered as complementary tools in the evaluation of these tumours. (18)F-FDOPA PET showed a significant prognostic role in the follow-up of LGGs and appeared to be a better tool than MR advanced techniques for outcome prediction. These results need to be confirmed with longitudinal studies on a larger population. Advances in knowledge: This is the first study that compared (18)F-FDOPA PET with perfusion and diffusion MR in LGGs during follow-up. These preliminary results highlight the importance of a multimodality approach in this field and evidence a potential role for (18)F-FDOPA PET to predict patients at risk for tumour progression.

Multiparametric evaluation of low grade gliomas at follow-up. comparison between diffusion and perfusion MR with (18)F-FDOPA PET / ROSSI ESPAGNET, MARIA CAMILLA; Romano, Andrea; Mancuso, V; Cicone, Francesco; Napolitano, A; Scaringi, Claudia; Minniti, Giuseppe; Bozzao, Alessandro. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0007-1285. - ELETTRONICO. - 89:1066(2016), pp. 1-7. [10.1259/bjr.20160476]

Multiparametric evaluation of low grade gliomas at follow-up. comparison between diffusion and perfusion MR with (18)F-FDOPA PET

ROSSI ESPAGNET, MARIA CAMILLA
;
ROMANO, Andrea;CICONE, FRANCESCO;Napolitano, A;SCARINGI, CLAUDIA;MINNITI, GIUSEPPE;BOZZAO, ALESSANDRO
2016

Abstract

Objective: To compare MRI using perfusion and diffusion techniques with 6-[(18)F]-fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) in the follow-up of low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and to identify the best imaging parameter to differentiate patients with different prognosis. Methods: Between 2010 and 2015, 12 patients with a pathology-proven diagnosis of LGG and MR (with perfusion and diffusion sequences) and a PET study during their follow-up were retrospectively included in our study. Cerebral blood volume (CBV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps on MR studies and PET images were evaluated using a region of interest-based method. All patients were categorized as stable or as having progressive disease at 1-year follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's correlation test and multivariate analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Results: No significant correlations were found between PET parameters [maximum tumour-to-controlateral normal brain ratio (T/Nmax) and tumour-to-striatum ratio] and ADC or relative CBV values measured in both PET hotspot regions and areas of maximum signal alterations. T/Nmax demonstrated a good sensitivity (83%) and specificity (100%) for differentiating two subgroups of patients with different outcomes at 1-year-follow-up (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Perfusion and diffusion MR images provide different information compared with (18)F-FDOPA PET in LGGs during follow-up and therefore, they should be considered as complementary tools in the evaluation of these tumours. (18)F-FDOPA PET showed a significant prognostic role in the follow-up of LGGs and appeared to be a better tool than MR advanced techniques for outcome prediction. These results need to be confirmed with longitudinal studies on a larger population. Advances in knowledge: This is the first study that compared (18)F-FDOPA PET with perfusion and diffusion MR in LGGs during follow-up. These preliminary results highlight the importance of a multimodality approach in this field and evidence a potential role for (18)F-FDOPA PET to predict patients at risk for tumour progression.
2016
.
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Multiparametric evaluation of low grade gliomas at follow-up. comparison between diffusion and perfusion MR with (18)F-FDOPA PET / ROSSI ESPAGNET, MARIA CAMILLA; Romano, Andrea; Mancuso, V; Cicone, Francesco; Napolitano, A; Scaringi, Claudia; Minniti, Giuseppe; Bozzao, Alessandro. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0007-1285. - ELETTRONICO. - 89:1066(2016), pp. 1-7. [10.1259/bjr.20160476]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Espagnet_Multiparametric-evaluation_2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.17 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.17 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/882025
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact