Lithium ion batteries are among the most promising electrochemical storage systems currently available. However, even though their high values of specific energy and energy density make them suitable for the development of new research approaches to counteract the global energy consumption, its diffusion is still limited in several sectors because of the high costs and safety problems. Five different Lithium ion cells of similar energy size but different chemical composition have been studied here, with the aim of pinpointing the fundamental characteristics of each battery. A comprehensive knowledge of these technol fogies can helpinding out the critical parameters indicating dangerous situations. An automated test system based on the synchronous measurement of battery voltage, current and temperature has been employed in this comparative study. The system allows for testing the cells with a huge variety of protocols, from the standard charge cycle to the more complex power control test. Experimental results highlight that, for example, the LiNiCoO2 and the Lithium Polymer batteries outperform for their energy density and specific energy while the LiFePO4 show the highest versatility, efficiency and safety.

Characterizing different types of lithium ion cells with an automated measurement system / Alessandrini, Stefano; Rizzuto, Emanuele; DEL PRETE, Zaccaria. - In: JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE. - ISSN 2352-152X. - STAMPA. - 7:(2016), pp. 244-251. [10.1016/j.est.2016.07.004]

Characterizing different types of lithium ion cells with an automated measurement system

ALESSANDRINI, STEFANO
;
RIZZUTO, EMANUELE
;
DEL PRETE, Zaccaria
2016

Abstract

Lithium ion batteries are among the most promising electrochemical storage systems currently available. However, even though their high values of specific energy and energy density make them suitable for the development of new research approaches to counteract the global energy consumption, its diffusion is still limited in several sectors because of the high costs and safety problems. Five different Lithium ion cells of similar energy size but different chemical composition have been studied here, with the aim of pinpointing the fundamental characteristics of each battery. A comprehensive knowledge of these technol fogies can helpinding out the critical parameters indicating dangerous situations. An automated test system based on the synchronous measurement of battery voltage, current and temperature has been employed in this comparative study. The system allows for testing the cells with a huge variety of protocols, from the standard charge cycle to the more complex power control test. Experimental results highlight that, for example, the LiNiCoO2 and the Lithium Polymer batteries outperform for their energy density and specific energy while the LiFePO4 show the highest versatility, efficiency and safety.
2016
automatic testing; electrode temperature; internal resistance; lithium batteries; lithium ion cells; energy engineering and power technology; Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment; Electrical and Electronic Engineering
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Characterizing different types of lithium ion cells with an automated measurement system / Alessandrini, Stefano; Rizzuto, Emanuele; DEL PRETE, Zaccaria. - In: JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE. - ISSN 2352-152X. - STAMPA. - 7:(2016), pp. 244-251. [10.1016/j.est.2016.07.004]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Alessandrini_characterizing-different_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.96 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.96 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/880723
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact