The management of patients with refractory GERD (rGERD) is a major clinical challenge for gastroenterologists. In up to 30% of patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation), acid-suppressive therapy does not provide clinical benefit. In this Review, we discuss the current management algorithm for GERD and the features and management of patients who do not respond to treatment (such as those individuals with an incorrect diagnosis of GERD, inadequate PPI intake, persisting acid reflux and persisting weakly acidic reflux). Symptom response to existing surgical techniques, novel antireflux procedures, and the value of add-on medical therapies (including prokinetics and reflux inhibitors) for rGERD symptoms are discussed. Pharmaceutical agents targeting oesophageal sensitivity, a condition that can contribute to symptom generation in rGERD, are also discussed. Finally, on the basis of available published data and our expert opinion, we present an outline of a current, usable algorithm for management of patients with rGERD that considers the timing and diagnostic use of pH-impedance monitoring on or off PPI, additional diagnostic tests, the clinical use of baclofen and the use of add-on neuromodulators (tricyclic agents and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors).

Management of refractory typical GERD symptoms / Scarpellini, Emidio; Ang, Daphne; Pauwels, Ans; DE SANTIS, Adriano; Vanuytsel, Tim; Tack, Jan. - In: NATURE REVIEWS. GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY. - ISSN 1759-5045. - STAMPA. - 13:(2016), pp. 281-294. [10.1038/nrgastro.2016.50]

Management of refractory typical GERD symptoms

SCARPELLINI, EMIDIO;DE SANTIS, Adriano;
2016

Abstract

The management of patients with refractory GERD (rGERD) is a major clinical challenge for gastroenterologists. In up to 30% of patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation), acid-suppressive therapy does not provide clinical benefit. In this Review, we discuss the current management algorithm for GERD and the features and management of patients who do not respond to treatment (such as those individuals with an incorrect diagnosis of GERD, inadequate PPI intake, persisting acid reflux and persisting weakly acidic reflux). Symptom response to existing surgical techniques, novel antireflux procedures, and the value of add-on medical therapies (including prokinetics and reflux inhibitors) for rGERD symptoms are discussed. Pharmaceutical agents targeting oesophageal sensitivity, a condition that can contribute to symptom generation in rGERD, are also discussed. Finally, on the basis of available published data and our expert opinion, we present an outline of a current, usable algorithm for management of patients with rGERD that considers the timing and diagnostic use of pH-impedance monitoring on or off PPI, additional diagnostic tests, the clinical use of baclofen and the use of add-on neuromodulators (tricyclic agents and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors).
2016
rGERD, PPI, Cisapride, Nissen fundoplication,Radiofrequency ablation therapy, Transoral incisionless oesophagogastro fundoplication, Intermittent electrical stimulation of the LES, Magnetic sphincter augmentation device
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Management of refractory typical GERD symptoms / Scarpellini, Emidio; Ang, Daphne; Pauwels, Ans; DE SANTIS, Adriano; Vanuytsel, Tim; Tack, Jan. - In: NATURE REVIEWS. GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY. - ISSN 1759-5045. - STAMPA. - 13:(2016), pp. 281-294. [10.1038/nrgastro.2016.50]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Scarpellini_management-refractory_2016.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 577.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
577.32 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/878523
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 92
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 64
social impact