Purpose: Posterior fossa ependymoma comprises two distinct molecular variants termed EPN-PFA and EPN-PFB that have a distinct biology and natural history. The therapeutic value of cytoreductive surgery and radiation therapy for posterior fossa ependymoma after accounting for molecular subgroup is not known. Methods: Four independent nonoverlapping retrospective cohorts of posterior fossa ependymomas (n = 820) were profiled using genome-wide methylation arrays. Risk stratification models were designed based on known clinical and newly described molecular biomarkers identified by multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: Molecular subgroup is a powerful independent predictor of outcome even when accounting for age or treatment regimen. Incompletely resected EPN-PFA ependymomas have a dismal prognosis, with a 5-year progression-free survival ranging from 26.1% to 56.8% across all four cohorts. Although first-line (adjuvant) radiation is clearly beneficial for completely resected EPN-PFA, a substantial proportion of patients with EPN-PFB can be cured with surgery alone, and patients with relapsed EPN-PFB can often be treated successfully with delayed external-beam irradiation. Conclusion: The most impactful biomarker for posterior fossa ependymoma is molecular subgroup affiliation, independent of other demographic or treatment variables. However, both EPN-PFA and EPN-PFB still benefit from increased extent of resection, with the survival rates being particularly poor for subtotally resected EPN-PFA, even with adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients with EPN-PFB who undergo gross total resection are at lower risk for relapse and should be considered for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of observation alone with radiation reserved for those who experience recurrence. © 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Therapeutic impact of cytoreductive surgery and irradiation of posterior fossa ependymoma in the molecular era: a retrospective multicohort analysis / Ramaswamy, V., Hielscher, T., Mack, S.C., Lassaletta, A., Lin, T., Pajtler, K.W., Jones, D.T.W., Luu, B., Cavalli, F.M.G., Aldape, K., Remke, M., Mynarek, M., Rutkowski, S., Gururangan, S., Mclendon, R.E., Lipp, E.S., Dunham, C., Hukin, J., Eisenstat, D.D., Fulton, D., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - 34:21(2016), pp. 2468-2477. [10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7825]

Therapeutic impact of cytoreductive surgery and irradiation of posterior fossa ependymoma in the molecular era: a retrospective multicohort analysis

GIANGASPERO, FELICE;BUTTARELLI, Francesca Romana;
2016

Abstract

Purpose: Posterior fossa ependymoma comprises two distinct molecular variants termed EPN-PFA and EPN-PFB that have a distinct biology and natural history. The therapeutic value of cytoreductive surgery and radiation therapy for posterior fossa ependymoma after accounting for molecular subgroup is not known. Methods: Four independent nonoverlapping retrospective cohorts of posterior fossa ependymomas (n = 820) were profiled using genome-wide methylation arrays. Risk stratification models were designed based on known clinical and newly described molecular biomarkers identified by multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: Molecular subgroup is a powerful independent predictor of outcome even when accounting for age or treatment regimen. Incompletely resected EPN-PFA ependymomas have a dismal prognosis, with a 5-year progression-free survival ranging from 26.1% to 56.8% across all four cohorts. Although first-line (adjuvant) radiation is clearly beneficial for completely resected EPN-PFA, a substantial proportion of patients with EPN-PFB can be cured with surgery alone, and patients with relapsed EPN-PFB can often be treated successfully with delayed external-beam irradiation. Conclusion: The most impactful biomarker for posterior fossa ependymoma is molecular subgroup affiliation, independent of other demographic or treatment variables. However, both EPN-PFA and EPN-PFB still benefit from increased extent of resection, with the survival rates being particularly poor for subtotally resected EPN-PFA, even with adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients with EPN-PFB who undergo gross total resection are at lower risk for relapse and should be considered for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of observation alone with radiation reserved for those who experience recurrence. © 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
2016
cancer research; oncology; posterior fossa ependymoma; cytoreductive surgery; radiation therapy
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Therapeutic impact of cytoreductive surgery and irradiation of posterior fossa ependymoma in the molecular era: a retrospective multicohort analysis / Ramaswamy, V., Hielscher, T., Mack, S.C., Lassaletta, A., Lin, T., Pajtler, K.W., Jones, D.T.W., Luu, B., Cavalli, F.M.G., Aldape, K., Remke, M., Mynarek, M., Rutkowski, S., Gururangan, S., Mclendon, R.E., Lipp, E.S., Dunham, C., Hukin, J., Eisenstat, D.D., Fulton, D., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - 34:21(2016), pp. 2468-2477. [10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7825]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Giangaspero_Therapeutic_2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962737/
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.38 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.38 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/878331
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 104
  • Scopus 194
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 166
social impact