Connectivity is defined as the property and degree of interchange between populations. In the marine environment, this property is strongly influenced by the strategy of larval development. This is especially true for benthic organisms, which have a sessile adult lifestyle and can rely only on the larval phase for dispersal. Larval developments can be classified into two main types: planktotrophic and non-planktotrophic (mostly lecithothrophic) development. It is reasonable to hypothesize that different larval developments produce different patterns of connectivity. Several hypotheses can be tested on the relationship between genetic connectivity and duration of the larval phase: (i) isolation by distance occurs in species with non- planktotrophic development and not in species with planktotrophic development; (ii) genetic diversity and variance distribution are different in the two classes: low diversity and larger intrapopulation variance with planktotrophic development; high diversity and larger interpopulation variance with lecithothrophic development; (iii) different phylogeographic structure: phylogenetic trees not geographically structured with planktotrophic development and geographically structured with lecithothrophic development; (iv) different haplotypes networks: few haplotypes shared by most with planktotrophic development, and more haplotypes shared by geographically related groups with the lecithothrophic development. We first positively tested these hypotheses on literature datasets of three species of the genus Crepidula with different larval developments. Then we applied the same approaches on three original case studies: the sibling species Columbella rustica (Mediterranean, lecithotrophic) and C. adansoni (Atlantic, planktotrophic); and the Antarctic Capulus subcompressus and Marseniopsis spp. (both planktotrophic). All analyses positively tested the hypotheses of relationship between genetic connectivity and duration of the larval phase. Noteworthy, in Antarctica the planktotrophic development is usually severely counterselected, due the strictly seasonal presence of phytoplankton. Capulus subcompressus is the only Antarctic capulid with a planktotrophic development, and the genetics analyses confirmed the high connectivity patterns among populations as well as for species of the genus Marseniopsis.

Larval strategies and connectivity in marine gastropods / Fassio, Giulia; Russini, Valeria; Modica, MARIA VITTORIA; Oliverio, Marco. - STAMPA. - IV:(2015), pp. 42-42. (Intervento presentato al convegno 76th National Conference of the Unione Zoologica Italiana tenutosi a Viterbo, Italia nel 15-18 Settembre 2015).

Larval strategies and connectivity in marine gastropods

FASSIO, GIULIA;RUSSINI, VALERIA;MODICA, MARIA VITTORIA;OLIVERIO, Marco
2015

Abstract

Connectivity is defined as the property and degree of interchange between populations. In the marine environment, this property is strongly influenced by the strategy of larval development. This is especially true for benthic organisms, which have a sessile adult lifestyle and can rely only on the larval phase for dispersal. Larval developments can be classified into two main types: planktotrophic and non-planktotrophic (mostly lecithothrophic) development. It is reasonable to hypothesize that different larval developments produce different patterns of connectivity. Several hypotheses can be tested on the relationship between genetic connectivity and duration of the larval phase: (i) isolation by distance occurs in species with non- planktotrophic development and not in species with planktotrophic development; (ii) genetic diversity and variance distribution are different in the two classes: low diversity and larger intrapopulation variance with planktotrophic development; high diversity and larger interpopulation variance with lecithothrophic development; (iii) different phylogeographic structure: phylogenetic trees not geographically structured with planktotrophic development and geographically structured with lecithothrophic development; (iv) different haplotypes networks: few haplotypes shared by most with planktotrophic development, and more haplotypes shared by geographically related groups with the lecithothrophic development. We first positively tested these hypotheses on literature datasets of three species of the genus Crepidula with different larval developments. Then we applied the same approaches on three original case studies: the sibling species Columbella rustica (Mediterranean, lecithotrophic) and C. adansoni (Atlantic, planktotrophic); and the Antarctic Capulus subcompressus and Marseniopsis spp. (both planktotrophic). All analyses positively tested the hypotheses of relationship between genetic connectivity and duration of the larval phase. Noteworthy, in Antarctica the planktotrophic development is usually severely counterselected, due the strictly seasonal presence of phytoplankton. Capulus subcompressus is the only Antarctic capulid with a planktotrophic development, and the genetics analyses confirmed the high connectivity patterns among populations as well as for species of the genus Marseniopsis.
2015
76th National Conference of the Unione Zoologica Italiana
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04d Abstract in atti di convegno
Larval strategies and connectivity in marine gastropods / Fassio, Giulia; Russini, Valeria; Modica, MARIA VITTORIA; Oliverio, Marco. - STAMPA. - IV:(2015), pp. 42-42. (Intervento presentato al convegno 76th National Conference of the Unione Zoologica Italiana tenutosi a Viterbo, Italia nel 15-18 Settembre 2015).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/872110
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact