During the annual conference “STI-Science and technology indicators 2014”, one of the main opportunities for specialists of science and technology metrics to meet each other – organized by the prestigious Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at the University of Leiden – a group of researchers produced a document that clearly recognizes the unanticipated consequences resulting from the pervasive misapplication of indicators to the evaluation of scientific performance. The article Bibliometrics: Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, published on April, 2015 on «Nature», establishes the 10 fundamental principles for anyone using quantitative metrics for evaluation purposes. Stressing the differences between the previous San Francisco Declaration of research assessment-DORA and the Manifesto, the paper emphasizes the strengths of the latter, that can be rightly considered a milestone on the road to evaluation research.

Contro le unanticipated consequences della valutazione quantitativa della ricerca: il Leiden Manifesto for research metrics / Faggiolani, Chiara. - In: AIB STUDI. - ISSN 2280-9112. - ELETTRONICO. - 55:3(2015), pp. 427-438. [10.2426/aibstudi-11366]

Contro le unanticipated consequences della valutazione quantitativa della ricerca: il Leiden Manifesto for research metrics

FAGGIOLANI, CHIARA
2015

Abstract

During the annual conference “STI-Science and technology indicators 2014”, one of the main opportunities for specialists of science and technology metrics to meet each other – organized by the prestigious Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at the University of Leiden – a group of researchers produced a document that clearly recognizes the unanticipated consequences resulting from the pervasive misapplication of indicators to the evaluation of scientific performance. The article Bibliometrics: Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, published on April, 2015 on «Nature», establishes the 10 fundamental principles for anyone using quantitative metrics for evaluation purposes. Stressing the differences between the previous San Francisco Declaration of research assessment-DORA and the Manifesto, the paper emphasizes the strengths of the latter, that can be rightly considered a milestone on the road to evaluation research.
2015
bibliometria; valutazione della ricerca
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Contro le unanticipated consequences della valutazione quantitativa della ricerca: il Leiden Manifesto for research metrics / Faggiolani, Chiara. - In: AIB STUDI. - ISSN 2280-9112. - ELETTRONICO. - 55:3(2015), pp. 427-438. [10.2426/aibstudi-11366]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Faggiolani_Contro_2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 339.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
339.22 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/865260
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact