During the annual conference “STI-Science and technology indicators 2014”, one of the main opportunities for specialists of science and technology metrics to meet each other – organized by the prestigious Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at the University of Leiden – a group of researchers produced a document that clearly recognizes the unanticipated consequences resulting from the pervasive misapplication of indicators to the evaluation of scientific performance. The article Bibliometrics: Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, published on April, 2015 on «Nature», establishes the 10 fundamental principles for anyone using quantitative metrics for evaluation purposes. Stressing the differences between the previous San Francisco Declaration of research assessment-DORA and the Manifesto, the paper emphasizes the strengths of the latter, that can be rightly considered a milestone on the road to evaluation research.
Contro le unanticipated consequences della valutazione quantitativa della ricerca: il Leiden Manifesto for research metrics / Faggiolani, Chiara. - In: AIB STUDI. - ISSN 2280-9112. - ELETTRONICO. - 55:3(2015), pp. 427-438. [10.2426/aibstudi-11366]
Contro le unanticipated consequences della valutazione quantitativa della ricerca: il Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
FAGGIOLANI, CHIARA
2015
Abstract
During the annual conference “STI-Science and technology indicators 2014”, one of the main opportunities for specialists of science and technology metrics to meet each other – organized by the prestigious Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at the University of Leiden – a group of researchers produced a document that clearly recognizes the unanticipated consequences resulting from the pervasive misapplication of indicators to the evaluation of scientific performance. The article Bibliometrics: Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, published on April, 2015 on «Nature», establishes the 10 fundamental principles for anyone using quantitative metrics for evaluation purposes. Stressing the differences between the previous San Francisco Declaration of research assessment-DORA and the Manifesto, the paper emphasizes the strengths of the latter, that can be rightly considered a milestone on the road to evaluation research.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Faggiolani_Contro_2015.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
339.22 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
339.22 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.