The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.
The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.
Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques? / Di Franco, Giovanni. - In: QUALITY & QUANTITY. - ISSN 0033-5177. - ELETTRONICO. - 50:(2016), pp. 1299-1315. [10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0]
Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?
DI FRANCO, Giovanni
Primo
2016
Abstract
The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
GDiFranco_Acm_2016_cartaceo.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Note: GDiFranco_acm_2016_cartaceo
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
409.06 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
409.06 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.