The aim of this paper is to investigate on chil- dren’s knowledge and imaginary about robots. To do so, we administered to 704 children from 17 classes of 8 elemen- tary and secondary schools, a survey with close and open questions about their conceptualization of robots. To carry out this study we took as point of reference the theoretical frameworkof social representations.Themainresults are that children evaluate toys, robots and human-beings as signifi- cantly different on all the characteristics considered. More than toys, robots have mechanical movements, they move, are more intelligent than toys but they do not keep company to them. By contrast, human beings are perceived by children starting from their corporeity: they eat and sleep, move by themselves, are intelligent and speak, keep eye-contact and company. However, children complain about the fact that human beings do not play with them. The imaginary about robots that children receive from media is characterized by anthropomorphic shapes, bodies and by human-like cogni- tions, feelings and behavior. The more examples of visual products with robots children are able to evoke, the higher they evaluate robots on all human-like characteristics (e.g. it looks into my eyes). Hence, the tension between imaginary and knowledge can be confounding because the human-like features of fictional robots are more advanced than those reachable by the factual ones.

Children’s Knowledge and Imaginary About Robots / Fortunati, Leopoldina; Esposito, Anna; Sarrica, Mauro; Ferrin, Giovanni. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS. - ISSN 1875-4791. - STAMPA. - 7:5(2015), pp. 685-695. [10.1007/s12369-015-0316-9]

Children’s Knowledge and Imaginary About Robots

SARRICA, Mauro;
2015

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate on chil- dren’s knowledge and imaginary about robots. To do so, we administered to 704 children from 17 classes of 8 elemen- tary and secondary schools, a survey with close and open questions about their conceptualization of robots. To carry out this study we took as point of reference the theoretical frameworkof social representations.Themainresults are that children evaluate toys, robots and human-beings as signifi- cantly different on all the characteristics considered. More than toys, robots have mechanical movements, they move, are more intelligent than toys but they do not keep company to them. By contrast, human beings are perceived by children starting from their corporeity: they eat and sleep, move by themselves, are intelligent and speak, keep eye-contact and company. However, children complain about the fact that human beings do not play with them. The imaginary about robots that children receive from media is characterized by anthropomorphic shapes, bodies and by human-like cogni- tions, feelings and behavior. The more examples of visual products with robots children are able to evoke, the higher they evaluate robots on all human-like characteristics (e.g. it looks into my eyes). Hence, the tension between imaginary and knowledge can be confounding because the human-like features of fictional robots are more advanced than those reachable by the factual ones.
2015
Child imagination; Human beings; Robots; Social representations; Toys; Computer Science (all)
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Children’s Knowledge and Imaginary About Robots / Fortunati, Leopoldina; Esposito, Anna; Sarrica, Mauro; Ferrin, Giovanni. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS. - ISSN 1875-4791. - STAMPA. - 7:5(2015), pp. 685-695. [10.1007/s12369-015-0316-9]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Sarrica_Children’s-Knowledge_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 727.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
727.4 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/858541
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact