PURPOSE: To assess and compare topographic features and preosteoblastic cell responses of a new hydrothermally treated, calcium-incorporated surface against other commercially available implant surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different surfaces were the subject of comparison in this study: machined (MC), resorbable blast media (RBM), sandblasted/large-grit/acid-etched (SLA), and calcium-incorporated SLA (Ca-SLA). Surface morphology and roughness were first characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and white light interferometer, respectively. Preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells were then cultured on the titanium surfaces. Cell morphology was observed at 24 hours, 48 hours, 7 days, and 15 days by SEM; differentiation was assessed at 7, 11, and 15 days by assaying alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and osteocalcin (OCN) levels. RESULTS: Surface characterization revealed nanotopographic features on Ca-SLA. At topographic analysis, SLA and Ca-SLA showed similar roughness values. Significant differences in cell differentiation parameters were found only at 15 days between the SLA surfaces (both Ca-incorporated and nonincorporated) and MC. CONCLUSION: Collectively, this study demonstrated that hydrothermal treatment determines the formation of nanotopography without altering the SLA microtopography. Moreover, Ca-SLA and SLA induce MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation at comparable levels

Physical profile and impact of a calcium-incorporated implant surface on preosteoblastic cell morphologic and differentiation parameters: a comparative analysis / Lollobrigida, Marco; Lamazza, Luca; Capuano, Cristina; Formisano, G; Serra, E; Laurito, Domenica; Romanelli, Maddalena; Molinari, A; DE BIASE, Alberto. - In: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS. - ISSN 0882-2786. - ELETTRONICO. - 31:1(2016), pp. 223-231. [10.11607/jomi.4247]

Physical profile and impact of a calcium-incorporated implant surface on preosteoblastic cell morphologic and differentiation parameters: a comparative analysis

Lollobrigida, Marco
Primo
;
LAMAZZA, LUCA
Secondo
;
CAPUANO, CRISTINA;LAURITO, DOMENICA;ROMANELLI, MADDALENA;DE BIASE, Alberto
Ultimo
2016

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess and compare topographic features and preosteoblastic cell responses of a new hydrothermally treated, calcium-incorporated surface against other commercially available implant surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different surfaces were the subject of comparison in this study: machined (MC), resorbable blast media (RBM), sandblasted/large-grit/acid-etched (SLA), and calcium-incorporated SLA (Ca-SLA). Surface morphology and roughness were first characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and white light interferometer, respectively. Preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells were then cultured on the titanium surfaces. Cell morphology was observed at 24 hours, 48 hours, 7 days, and 15 days by SEM; differentiation was assessed at 7, 11, and 15 days by assaying alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and osteocalcin (OCN) levels. RESULTS: Surface characterization revealed nanotopographic features on Ca-SLA. At topographic analysis, SLA and Ca-SLA showed similar roughness values. Significant differences in cell differentiation parameters were found only at 15 days between the SLA surfaces (both Ca-incorporated and nonincorporated) and MC. CONCLUSION: Collectively, this study demonstrated that hydrothermal treatment determines the formation of nanotopography without altering the SLA microtopography. Moreover, Ca-SLA and SLA induce MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation at comparable levels
2016
calcium ions; implant; implant surfaces; surface roughness; surface treatment
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Physical profile and impact of a calcium-incorporated implant surface on preosteoblastic cell morphologic and differentiation parameters: a comparative analysis / Lollobrigida, Marco; Lamazza, Luca; Capuano, Cristina; Formisano, G; Serra, E; Laurito, Domenica; Romanelli, Maddalena; Molinari, A; DE BIASE, Alberto. - In: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS. - ISSN 0882-2786. - ELETTRONICO. - 31:1(2016), pp. 223-231. [10.11607/jomi.4247]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Lollobrigida_Physical_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 379.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
379.18 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/851667
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact