Algae represent a favourable and potentially sustainable source of biomass for bioenergy-based industrial pathways in the future. The study, performed on a real pilot plant implemented in Augusta (Italy) within the frame of the BioWALK4Biofuels project, aims to figure out whether seaweed (macroalgae) cultivated in near-shore open ponds could be considered a beneficial aspect as a source of biomass for biogas production within the co-digestion with local agricultural biological waste. The LCA results confirm that the analysed A and B scenarios (namely the algae-based co-digestion scenario and agricultural mix feedstock scenario) present an environmental performance more favourable than that achieved with conventional non-renewable-based technologies (specifically natural gas - Scenario C). Results show that the use of seaweed (Scenario A) represent a feasible solution in order to replace classical biomass used for biofuel production from a land-based feedstock. The improvement of the environmental performances is quantifiable on 10% respect to Scenario B, and 38 times higher than Scenario C

Co-digestion of macroalgae for biogas production. An LCA-based environmental evaluation / Cappelli, Andrea; Gigli, Emanuele; Romagnoli, F.; Simoni, Silvano; Blumberga, D.; Palerno, M.; Guerriero, E.. - In: ENERGY PROCEDIA. - ISSN 1876-6102. - ELETTRONICO. - 72, 1 June 2015:(2015), pp. 3-10. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Scientific Conference “Environmental and Climate Technologies", CONECT 2014 tenutosi a Riga; Lettonia nel October 2014) [10.1016/j.egypro.2015.06.002].

Co-digestion of macroalgae for biogas production. An LCA-based environmental evaluation

CAPPELLI, Andrea
Primo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
GIGLI, EMANUELE;SIMONI, SILVANO;
2015

Abstract

Algae represent a favourable and potentially sustainable source of biomass for bioenergy-based industrial pathways in the future. The study, performed on a real pilot plant implemented in Augusta (Italy) within the frame of the BioWALK4Biofuels project, aims to figure out whether seaweed (macroalgae) cultivated in near-shore open ponds could be considered a beneficial aspect as a source of biomass for biogas production within the co-digestion with local agricultural biological waste. The LCA results confirm that the analysed A and B scenarios (namely the algae-based co-digestion scenario and agricultural mix feedstock scenario) present an environmental performance more favourable than that achieved with conventional non-renewable-based technologies (specifically natural gas - Scenario C). Results show that the use of seaweed (Scenario A) represent a feasible solution in order to replace classical biomass used for biofuel production from a land-based feedstock. The improvement of the environmental performances is quantifiable on 10% respect to Scenario B, and 38 times higher than Scenario C
2015
International Scientific Conference “Environmental and Climate Technologies", CONECT 2014
life cycle assessment (LCA); marine macroalage; biogas; anaerobic co-digestion
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04c Atto di convegno in rivista
Co-digestion of macroalgae for biogas production. An LCA-based environmental evaluation / Cappelli, Andrea; Gigli, Emanuele; Romagnoli, F.; Simoni, Silvano; Blumberga, D.; Palerno, M.; Guerriero, E.. - In: ENERGY PROCEDIA. - ISSN 1876-6102. - ELETTRONICO. - 72, 1 June 2015:(2015), pp. 3-10. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Scientific Conference “Environmental and Climate Technologies", CONECT 2014 tenutosi a Riga; Lettonia nel October 2014) [10.1016/j.egypro.2015.06.002].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cappelli_Co-digestion-macroalgae_2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Articolo
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 797.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
797.26 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/830859
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact