With the aim of studying the relationship between methods of emotion regulation and quality of attachment we examined 39 infants with different patterns of attachment, of whom 20 were classified as secure (B), 12 as avoidant (A) and 7 as resistant (C), assessing the regulatory strategies adopted by them during the Strange Situation at 13 months. Secure infants used strategies of positive social engagement more than insecure avoidant infants, while resistant infants displayed greater negative social engagement and less object orientation than the other two groups. Avoidant infants adopted positive and negative hetero-regulatory strategies less than the other groups, also differing from resistant infants in their greater use of object regulatory strategies. There were no significant differences as regards self-comforting regulation. Thus, the findings showed how the most significant differences to emerge between the groups concerned hetero-regulatory strategies, developed by the infant in interaction with attachment figures, and regulatory strategies oriented towards objects. Further analysis showed how the use by part of each attachment group of the emotion regulation strategies varies, differentiating the episodes of the SSP according to their level of stress. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Attachment patterns and emotion regulation strategies in the second year / Cristina Riva, Crugnola; Tambelli, Renata; S., Gazzotti; C., Caprin; Maria, Spinelli; Alessandro, Albizzati. - In: INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 0163-6383. - ELETTRONICO. - 34:1(2011), pp. 136-151. [10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.11.002]

Attachment patterns and emotion regulation strategies in the second year

TAMBELLI, Renata;
2011

Abstract

With the aim of studying the relationship between methods of emotion regulation and quality of attachment we examined 39 infants with different patterns of attachment, of whom 20 were classified as secure (B), 12 as avoidant (A) and 7 as resistant (C), assessing the regulatory strategies adopted by them during the Strange Situation at 13 months. Secure infants used strategies of positive social engagement more than insecure avoidant infants, while resistant infants displayed greater negative social engagement and less object orientation than the other two groups. Avoidant infants adopted positive and negative hetero-regulatory strategies less than the other groups, also differing from resistant infants in their greater use of object regulatory strategies. There were no significant differences as regards self-comforting regulation. Thus, the findings showed how the most significant differences to emerge between the groups concerned hetero-regulatory strategies, developed by the infant in interaction with attachment figures, and regulatory strategies oriented towards objects. Further analysis showed how the use by part of each attachment group of the emotion regulation strategies varies, differentiating the episodes of the SSP according to their level of stress. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2011
infancy; self-regulatory strategies; emotion regulation; attachment; object oriented regulatory strategies; hetero-regulatory strategies
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Attachment patterns and emotion regulation strategies in the second year / Cristina Riva, Crugnola; Tambelli, Renata; S., Gazzotti; C., Caprin; Maria, Spinelli; Alessandro, Albizzati. - In: INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 0163-6383. - ELETTRONICO. - 34:1(2011), pp. 136-151. [10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.11.002]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/80504
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact