BACKGROUND: In selected patients with N0 rectal cancer, endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) may be an alternative treatment option to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME). Aim of this study is to evaluate the short- and medium-term quality of life (QoL) from a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in patients with iT2-iT3 N0-N+ rectal cancer, who underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (n-RCT). METHODS: Thirty patients with iT2-iT3 rectal cancer who underwent ELRR by TEM (n = 15) or LTME (n = 15) were enrolled in this study. The choice for one operation or the other was made on the basis of predefined criteria. QoL was evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires at admission, after n-RCT and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in QoL evaluation were observed between the two groups, both at admission and after n-RCT. At 1 month after surgery, significantly better results in the ELRR group were observed by QLQ-C30 in: Nausea/Vomiting (p = 0.05), Appetite Loss (p = 0.003), Constipation (p = 0.05), and by QLQ-CR38 in: Body Image (p = 0.05), Sexual Functioning (p = 0.03), Future Perspective (p = 0.05) and Weight Loss (p = 0.036). At 6 months after surgery, a statistically significant worse impact after LTME was observed by QLQ-C30 in: Global Health Status (p = 0.05), Emotional Functioning (p = 0.021), Dyspnea (p = 0.008), Insomnia (p = 0.012), Appetite Loss (p = 0.014) and by QLQ-CR38 in Body Image (p = 0.05) and Defecation Problems (p = 0.001). At 1 year, the two groups were homogenous as assessed by QLQ-C30, whereas the QLQ-CR38 still showed better results of ELRR versus LTME in Body Image (p = 0.006), Defecation Problems (p = 0.01), and Weight Loss (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present series, in selected patients, earlier restoration of patients' functions is observed after ELRR by TEM than after LTME.

Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision / D'Ambrosio, Giancarlo; Paganini, ALESSANDRO MARIA; Balla, Andrea; Quaresima, Silvia; Ursi, Pietro; Bruzzone, Paolo; Picchetto, Andrea; Mattei, Fi; Lezoche, Emanuele. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - STAMPA. - 30:2(2016), pp. 504-511. [10.1007/s00464-015-4232-8]

Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision

D'AMBROSIO, Giancarlo
;
PAGANINI, ALESSANDRO MARIA;BALLA, ANDREA;QUARESIMA, SILVIA;URSI, PIETRO;BRUZZONE, Paolo;PICCHETTO, ANDREA;LEZOCHE, Emanuele
2016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In selected patients with N0 rectal cancer, endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) may be an alternative treatment option to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME). Aim of this study is to evaluate the short- and medium-term quality of life (QoL) from a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in patients with iT2-iT3 N0-N+ rectal cancer, who underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (n-RCT). METHODS: Thirty patients with iT2-iT3 rectal cancer who underwent ELRR by TEM (n = 15) or LTME (n = 15) were enrolled in this study. The choice for one operation or the other was made on the basis of predefined criteria. QoL was evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires at admission, after n-RCT and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in QoL evaluation were observed between the two groups, both at admission and after n-RCT. At 1 month after surgery, significantly better results in the ELRR group were observed by QLQ-C30 in: Nausea/Vomiting (p = 0.05), Appetite Loss (p = 0.003), Constipation (p = 0.05), and by QLQ-CR38 in: Body Image (p = 0.05), Sexual Functioning (p = 0.03), Future Perspective (p = 0.05) and Weight Loss (p = 0.036). At 6 months after surgery, a statistically significant worse impact after LTME was observed by QLQ-C30 in: Global Health Status (p = 0.05), Emotional Functioning (p = 0.021), Dyspnea (p = 0.008), Insomnia (p = 0.012), Appetite Loss (p = 0.014) and by QLQ-CR38 in Body Image (p = 0.05) and Defecation Problems (p = 0.001). At 1 year, the two groups were homogenous as assessed by QLQ-C30, whereas the QLQ-CR38 still showed better results of ELRR versus LTME in Body Image (p = 0.006), Defecation Problems (p = 0.01), and Weight Loss (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present series, in selected patients, earlier restoration of patients' functions is observed after ELRR by TEM than after LTME.
2016
Rectal cancer-Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy(n-RCT)-Transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM)-Endoluminal locoregional resection (ELRR)-Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(LTME)-Quality of life(QoL)
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision / D'Ambrosio, Giancarlo; Paganini, ALESSANDRO MARIA; Balla, Andrea; Quaresima, Silvia; Ursi, Pietro; Bruzzone, Paolo; Picchetto, Andrea; Mattei, Fi; Lezoche, Emanuele. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - STAMPA. - 30:2(2016), pp. 504-511. [10.1007/s00464-015-4232-8]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
D'Ambrosio_Quality-life_2016.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Note: PDF
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 647.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
647.12 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/798980
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact