The purpose of mechanical ventilation is to rest the respiratory muscles while providing adequate gas exchange. Ventilatory support proved to be indispensable during the 1952 polio epidemic in Copenhagen, decreasing mortality among patients with paralytic polio from more than 80% to approximately 40%.1 Despite the clear benefits of this therapy, many patients eventually die after the initiation of mechanical ventilation, even though their arterial blood gases may have normalized. This mortality has been ascribed to multiple factors, including complications of ventilation such as barotrauma (i.e., gross air leaks), oxygen toxicity, and hemodynamic compromise.2,3 During the polio epidemic, investigators noted that mechanical ventilation could cause structural damage to the lung.4 In 1967, the term “respirator lung” was coined to describe the diffuse alveolar infiltrates and hyaline membranes that were found on postmortem examination of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation.5 More recently, there has been a renewed focus on the worsening injury that mechanical ventilation can cause in previously damaged lungs and the damage it can initiate in normal lungs. This damage is characterized pathologically by inflammatory-cell infiltrates, hyaline membranes, increased vascular permeability, and pulmonary edema. The constellation of pulmonary consequences of mechanical ventilation has been termed ventilator-induced lung injury. The concept of ventilator-induced lung injury is not new. In 1744, John Fothergill discussed a case of a patient who was “dead in appearance” after exposure to coal fumes and who was successfully treated by mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.6 Fothergill noted that mouth-to-mouth resuscitation was preferable to using bellows because “the lungs of one man may bear, without injury, as great a force as those of another man can exert; which by the bellows cannot always be determin'd.” Fothergill clearly understood the concept that mechanical forces generated by bellows (i.e., a ventilator) could lead to injury. However, it was not until early in this century that the clinical importance of ventilator-induced lung injury in adults was confirmed by a study showing that a ventilator strategy designed to minimize such injury decreased mortality among patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).7 Given the clinical importance of ventilator-induced lung injury, this article will review mechanisms underlying the condition, its biologic and physiological consequences, and clinical strategies to prevent it and mitigate its effects.

Ventilator-induced lung injury / Slutsky, As; Ranieri, VITO MARCO. - In: THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. - ISSN 0028-4793. - ELETTRONICO. - 22:369(2013), pp. 2126-2136. [10.1056/NEJMra1208707]

Ventilator-induced lung injury

RANIERI, VITO MARCO
2013

Abstract

The purpose of mechanical ventilation is to rest the respiratory muscles while providing adequate gas exchange. Ventilatory support proved to be indispensable during the 1952 polio epidemic in Copenhagen, decreasing mortality among patients with paralytic polio from more than 80% to approximately 40%.1 Despite the clear benefits of this therapy, many patients eventually die after the initiation of mechanical ventilation, even though their arterial blood gases may have normalized. This mortality has been ascribed to multiple factors, including complications of ventilation such as barotrauma (i.e., gross air leaks), oxygen toxicity, and hemodynamic compromise.2,3 During the polio epidemic, investigators noted that mechanical ventilation could cause structural damage to the lung.4 In 1967, the term “respirator lung” was coined to describe the diffuse alveolar infiltrates and hyaline membranes that were found on postmortem examination of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation.5 More recently, there has been a renewed focus on the worsening injury that mechanical ventilation can cause in previously damaged lungs and the damage it can initiate in normal lungs. This damage is characterized pathologically by inflammatory-cell infiltrates, hyaline membranes, increased vascular permeability, and pulmonary edema. The constellation of pulmonary consequences of mechanical ventilation has been termed ventilator-induced lung injury. The concept of ventilator-induced lung injury is not new. In 1744, John Fothergill discussed a case of a patient who was “dead in appearance” after exposure to coal fumes and who was successfully treated by mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.6 Fothergill noted that mouth-to-mouth resuscitation was preferable to using bellows because “the lungs of one man may bear, without injury, as great a force as those of another man can exert; which by the bellows cannot always be determin'd.” Fothergill clearly understood the concept that mechanical forces generated by bellows (i.e., a ventilator) could lead to injury. However, it was not until early in this century that the clinical importance of ventilator-induced lung injury in adults was confirmed by a study showing that a ventilator strategy designed to minimize such injury decreased mortality among patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).7 Given the clinical importance of ventilator-induced lung injury, this article will review mechanisms underlying the condition, its biologic and physiological consequences, and clinical strategies to prevent it and mitigate its effects.
2013
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Ventilator-induced lung injury / Slutsky, As; Ranieri, VITO MARCO. - In: THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. - ISSN 0028-4793. - ELETTRONICO. - 22:369(2013), pp. 2126-2136. [10.1056/NEJMra1208707]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/781681
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 562
  • Scopus 1360
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1300
social impact