Wireless sensor network research usually focuses on the reliable and efficient collection of data. In this paper we target on the next step in the lifetime of traces: we aim at investigating and evaluating, by qualitative and quantitative means, data repositories of already collected measurements. Concerning the collected datasets, several important topics arise like the need of exchanging traces between researchers using a common representation of the traces and the need for common classification of the traces based on a commonly agreed set of statistical characteristics for in retrospect utilization. In order to qualitatively address these issues, we propose the use of a novel set of metrics focusing on the in-network data-aggregation problem class. These metrics enable reliable evaluation of algorithms using the same benchmark traces (both in average cases and “stressful” setups) removing the need for running algorithms in a real testbed, at least in the initial development stage. We present the results of our research as a first approach for addressing this problem, and in order to confirm our method, we characterized several traces with the proposed metrics. We validate the metrics by predicting the performance of three data-aggregation schemes using the available traces and checking the results by actually running the algorithms.

Post-processing in wireless sensor networks: Benchmarking sensor trace files for in-network data aggregation / Evangelos, Theodoridis; Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis; Stefan, Dulman. - In: JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS. - ISSN 1084-8045. - STAMPA. - 35:(2012), pp. 548-561. [10.1016/j.jnca.2010.12.020]

Post-processing in wireless sensor networks: Benchmarking sensor trace files for in-network data aggregation

CHATZIGIANNAKIS, IOANNIS;
2012

Abstract

Wireless sensor network research usually focuses on the reliable and efficient collection of data. In this paper we target on the next step in the lifetime of traces: we aim at investigating and evaluating, by qualitative and quantitative means, data repositories of already collected measurements. Concerning the collected datasets, several important topics arise like the need of exchanging traces between researchers using a common representation of the traces and the need for common classification of the traces based on a commonly agreed set of statistical characteristics for in retrospect utilization. In order to qualitatively address these issues, we propose the use of a novel set of metrics focusing on the in-network data-aggregation problem class. These metrics enable reliable evaluation of algorithms using the same benchmark traces (both in average cases and “stressful” setups) removing the need for running algorithms in a real testbed, at least in the initial development stage. We present the results of our research as a first approach for addressing this problem, and in order to confirm our method, we characterized several traces with the proposed metrics. We validate the metrics by predicting the performance of three data-aggregation schemes using the available traces and checking the results by actually running the algorithms.
2012
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Post-processing in wireless sensor networks: Benchmarking sensor trace files for in-network data aggregation / Evangelos, Theodoridis; Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis; Stefan, Dulman. - In: JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS. - ISSN 1084-8045. - STAMPA. - 35:(2012), pp. 548-561. [10.1016/j.jnca.2010.12.020]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
VE_2012_11573-779550.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.76 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.76 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/779550
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact