Very few comparative evaluations of meta-analysis of published data and meta-analysis using individual patient data have appeared in the medical literature. The association between type of delivery and HIV perinatal transmission appears to be an excellent study case, given the recent publication of the meta-analysis of individual patient data by the International Perinatal, HIV Group. In this paper, we report the results of a meta-analysis of the published studies, which show a statistically significant reduction of perinatal HIV transmission rate with Caesarean section. The results are surprisingly similar to those of the recently published meta-analysis of individual patient data, indicating that, in the absence of significant confounding, the two meta-analytic methods are likely to give consistent results. In this era of constrained resources for biomedical research, caution should be taken in abandoning meta-analysis of published data for studying epidemiological associations of public health interest. (C) 2003 The Royal Institute of Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Meta-analysis of published studies or meta-analysis of individual data? Caesarean section in HIV-positive women as a study case / I. F., Angelillo; Villari, Paolo. - In: PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 0033-3506. - STAMPA. - 117:5(2003), pp. 323-328. [10.1016/s0033-3506(03)00105-7]

Meta-analysis of published studies or meta-analysis of individual data? Caesarean section in HIV-positive women as a study case

VILLARI, Paolo
2003

Abstract

Very few comparative evaluations of meta-analysis of published data and meta-analysis using individual patient data have appeared in the medical literature. The association between type of delivery and HIV perinatal transmission appears to be an excellent study case, given the recent publication of the meta-analysis of individual patient data by the International Perinatal, HIV Group. In this paper, we report the results of a meta-analysis of the published studies, which show a statistically significant reduction of perinatal HIV transmission rate with Caesarean section. The results are surprisingly similar to those of the recently published meta-analysis of individual patient data, indicating that, in the absence of significant confounding, the two meta-analytic methods are likely to give consistent results. In this era of constrained resources for biomedical research, caution should be taken in abandoning meta-analysis of published data for studying epidemiological associations of public health interest. (C) 2003 The Royal Institute of Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2003
caesarean section; hiv infection; meta-analysis; observational cohort studies; pooled analysis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Meta-analysis of published studies or meta-analysis of individual data? Caesarean section in HIV-positive women as a study case / I. F., Angelillo; Villari, Paolo. - In: PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 0033-3506. - STAMPA. - 117:5(2003), pp. 323-328. [10.1016/s0033-3506(03)00105-7]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Angelillo_Public Health_2003.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 112.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
112.97 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/77538
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact