PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: To compare methods, epidemiological features, and legislations of first trimester termination of pregnancy in two European Union University Hospital: Szeged, Hungary, (UHS) and Rome, Italy (UHR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 195 women in UHS and 197 women in UHR undergoing a termination of pregnancy, The method used in UHR was electric vacuum aspiration, while in UHS it is chosen according to the patients' features. RESULTS: Mean gestational week at the time of interruption was 8.21 ± 0.12 SD for UHS and 9.00 ± 0.08 SD for UHR (p = 0.000 1). Previous artificial termination of pregnancy was 0.40 ± 0.05 SD for UHR, and 0.77 ± 0.07 SD for UHS (p = 0.0001). Foreign women were 32.5% in UHR and 0.5% in UHS. Incidence of side effects was 1% for UHS and 0.5% for UHR. Parity was 2.54 ± 0.12 SD for UHR and 3.00 ± 0.14 SD for UHS (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The methods for interruption resulted safe and effective. Antibiotic prophylaxis, routinely provided in UHR, turned out to be effective to pre- vent post-operative infections. Cervical priming with Laminaria is safe, but patient's hospitalization is required. Different legislations may account for some epidemiological differences between the two hospitals.

First trimester termination of pregnancy: methods in comparison between two European university hospitals / De Filippis, Angela; D'Arpe, Stella; De Stefano Maria, Grazia; Meszaros, G; Della Vella, Beatrice; Mele, Alessandro; Minozzi, Massimo. - In: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 0390-6663. - 42:2(2015), pp. 133-138. [10.12891/ceog1914.2015]

First trimester termination of pregnancy: methods in comparison between two European university hospitals

D'ARPE, STELLA
;
2015

Abstract

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: To compare methods, epidemiological features, and legislations of first trimester termination of pregnancy in two European Union University Hospital: Szeged, Hungary, (UHS) and Rome, Italy (UHR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 195 women in UHS and 197 women in UHR undergoing a termination of pregnancy, The method used in UHR was electric vacuum aspiration, while in UHS it is chosen according to the patients' features. RESULTS: Mean gestational week at the time of interruption was 8.21 ± 0.12 SD for UHS and 9.00 ± 0.08 SD for UHR (p = 0.000 1). Previous artificial termination of pregnancy was 0.40 ± 0.05 SD for UHR, and 0.77 ± 0.07 SD for UHS (p = 0.0001). Foreign women were 32.5% in UHR and 0.5% in UHS. Incidence of side effects was 1% for UHS and 0.5% for UHR. Parity was 2.54 ± 0.12 SD for UHR and 3.00 ± 0.14 SD for UHS (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The methods for interruption resulted safe and effective. Antibiotic prophylaxis, routinely provided in UHR, turned out to be effective to pre- vent post-operative infections. Cervical priming with Laminaria is safe, but patient's hospitalization is required. Different legislations may account for some epidemiological differences between the two hospitals.
2015
first trimester termination of pregnancy; cervical preparation; Karman method; abortion legislation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
First trimester termination of pregnancy: methods in comparison between two European university hospitals / De Filippis, Angela; D'Arpe, Stella; De Stefano Maria, Grazia; Meszaros, G; Della Vella, Beatrice; Mele, Alessandro; Minozzi, Massimo. - In: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 0390-6663. - 42:2(2015), pp. 133-138. [10.12891/ceog1914.2015]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
DeFilippis_First-trimester_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 109.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
109.6 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/775172
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact