Acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes in intestinal transplant recipients are diagnosed by histologic and clinical findings. We have applied zoom video endoscopy and the use of serologic markers granzyme B (GrB) and perforin (PrF) to monitor rejection together with conventional tools. Seven hundred eighty-two blood samples (obtained at the time of the biopsy) collected from 34 recipients for GrB/PrF upregulation were positive among 64.9% of ACRs during a 3-year follow-up. Considering only the first year results posttransplantation, it reached 73.1% of rejection events. Zoom videoendoscopy was used by our group in 29 recipients of isolated intestine (n = 24) or multivisceral transplantations (n = 5) to enable observation of villi and crypt areas. From more than 270 procedures, 84% of the zoom findings agreed with the histologic results, namely, a specificity of 95%. In fact, during ongoing ACR, villi were altered in 80% of cases. Both procedures were helpful to support conventional histologic findings and clinical symptoms of ACR in intestinal transplant recipients.

Acute cellular rejection monitoring after intestinal transplant: Utility of serologic markers and zoom videoendoscopy as support of conventional biopsy and clinical findings / Lauro, A.; Altimari, A.; Di Simone, M.; Dazzi, A.; Cescon, M.; Zanfi, C.; Miklosova, Z.; Corti, B.; Gruppioni, E.; D'Errico, A.; Cautero, N.; Giustozzi, G.; Ansaloni, L.; Ramacciato, Giovanni; Gruttadauria, S.; Gruttadauria, G.; Pinna, A. D.. - In: TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS. - ISSN 0041-1345. - 40:5(2008), pp. 1575-1576. [10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.153]

Acute cellular rejection monitoring after intestinal transplant: Utility of serologic markers and zoom videoendoscopy as support of conventional biopsy and clinical findings

A. Lauro;RAMACCIATO, Giovanni;
2008

Abstract

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes in intestinal transplant recipients are diagnosed by histologic and clinical findings. We have applied zoom video endoscopy and the use of serologic markers granzyme B (GrB) and perforin (PrF) to monitor rejection together with conventional tools. Seven hundred eighty-two blood samples (obtained at the time of the biopsy) collected from 34 recipients for GrB/PrF upregulation were positive among 64.9% of ACRs during a 3-year follow-up. Considering only the first year results posttransplantation, it reached 73.1% of rejection events. Zoom videoendoscopy was used by our group in 29 recipients of isolated intestine (n = 24) or multivisceral transplantations (n = 5) to enable observation of villi and crypt areas. From more than 270 procedures, 84% of the zoom findings agreed with the histologic results, namely, a specificity of 95%. In fact, during ongoing ACR, villi were altered in 80% of cases. Both procedures were helpful to support conventional histologic findings and clinical symptoms of ACR in intestinal transplant recipients.
2008
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Acute cellular rejection monitoring after intestinal transplant: Utility of serologic markers and zoom videoendoscopy as support of conventional biopsy and clinical findings / Lauro, A.; Altimari, A.; Di Simone, M.; Dazzi, A.; Cescon, M.; Zanfi, C.; Miklosova, Z.; Corti, B.; Gruppioni, E.; D'Errico, A.; Cautero, N.; Giustozzi, G.; Ansaloni, L.; Ramacciato, Giovanni; Gruttadauria, S.; Gruttadauria, G.; Pinna, A. D.. - In: TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS. - ISSN 0041-1345. - 40:5(2008), pp. 1575-1576. [10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.153]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/74013
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact