The economic crisis is affecting the patterns of political governance because of the compression of public arenas about the issues concerning quality of life and energy supply. The Italian controversy on the energy matter is emblematic of two increasingly obvious phenomena: in contemporary democracies, we find plans of emptying some of the democratic institutions, clashing with attempts of re- appropriation of spaces of democracy from below: on the one hand, the deficit of social and cultural legitimacy suffered by political institutions, on the other hand, the design of "confiscation of democracy" in which the policy maker tries to counteract prior instances of deliberative participation advanced by the public opinion. Virtually ignored by mainstream media, the debate on nuclear power has been in the middle of a dense network of conversations from below, which eventually affect public opinion. The success of the referendum on the nuclear issue enshrines the internet as an alternative political engine and, at the same time, a tool of “self-summoning” for the citizens. By comparing data on old and new media, it’s shown how networked conversations have ended up conditioning the media agenda and affecting the public opinion by the conveying of values and interests once alien to the interpretive framework in which the case was politically orchestrated. The still unresolved issue concerns the affinities and semantic break between old and new movements in terms of communication strategies used to achieve consensus and to overturn the status quo. It remains to understand how the media platforms will transform themselves to meet the challenge of energy emitted by these social forms of civic engagement.

Nuclear Issue, Risk and Design of "Confiscation of Democracy". The Italian Case / D., Borrelli; Gavrila, Mihaela; S., Siciliano. - STAMPA. - (2013), pp. 1022-1023. (Intervento presentato al convegno ESA 11th Conference Crisis, Critique and Change tenutosi a Torino nel 28-31 August 2013).

Nuclear Issue, Risk and Design of "Confiscation of Democracy". The Italian Case

GAVRILA, Mihaela;
2013

Abstract

The economic crisis is affecting the patterns of political governance because of the compression of public arenas about the issues concerning quality of life and energy supply. The Italian controversy on the energy matter is emblematic of two increasingly obvious phenomena: in contemporary democracies, we find plans of emptying some of the democratic institutions, clashing with attempts of re- appropriation of spaces of democracy from below: on the one hand, the deficit of social and cultural legitimacy suffered by political institutions, on the other hand, the design of "confiscation of democracy" in which the policy maker tries to counteract prior instances of deliberative participation advanced by the public opinion. Virtually ignored by mainstream media, the debate on nuclear power has been in the middle of a dense network of conversations from below, which eventually affect public opinion. The success of the referendum on the nuclear issue enshrines the internet as an alternative political engine and, at the same time, a tool of “self-summoning” for the citizens. By comparing data on old and new media, it’s shown how networked conversations have ended up conditioning the media agenda and affecting the public opinion by the conveying of values and interests once alien to the interpretive framework in which the case was politically orchestrated. The still unresolved issue concerns the affinities and semantic break between old and new movements in terms of communication strategies used to achieve consensus and to overturn the status quo. It remains to understand how the media platforms will transform themselves to meet the challenge of energy emitted by these social forms of civic engagement.
2013
ESA 11th Conference Crisis, Critique and Change
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Nuclear Issue, Risk and Design of "Confiscation of Democracy". The Italian Case / D., Borrelli; Gavrila, Mihaela; S., Siciliano. - STAMPA. - (2013), pp. 1022-1023. (Intervento presentato al convegno ESA 11th Conference Crisis, Critique and Change tenutosi a Torino nel 28-31 August 2013).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/733938
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact