Although exercise stress echocardiography is currently used to evaluate coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, the best exercise methodology is still undefined. The objectives of the study were: (1) to compare supine bicycle stress echocardiography (SBSE) and treadmill in the evaluation of CAD; and (2) to define, in normal subjects, the different behavior of factors determining MVO2 wish treadmill and SBSE. We selected 10 male patients with CAD (group A), and 10 male control subjects (group B). Each patient underwent SBSE and tread-mill testing in random order. We studied heart sate, systolic blood pressure, heart rate x systolic blood pressure, and end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes. in group A, we also studied wall motion score index (according to the American Society of Echocardiography) and in group B, systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume index. The results were as follows: Group A: SBSE resulted in significantly lower work load, heart rate, and significantly higher systolic blood pressure, heart hate x systolic blood pressure, end-diastolic volume index, end-systolic volume index, and wall motion score index. SBSE showed wall motion abnormalities in each patient, whereas treadmill did not detect wail motion abnormalities in 4 patients (3 single-vessel; 1 multivessel); of the other 6 patients, 2 showed a lower wall motion score index and 4 did not show any difference in left ventricle kinetics with the 2 methodologies of exercise. Mean acquisition time for postexercise images was 72 +/- 6 seconds. Group B: SBSE resulted in lower work load, heart rate, heart rate x systolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume index, and higher end-diastolic volume index and end-systolic volume index. Systolic blood pressure was similar with SBSE and treadmill testing. In conclusion, our experience suggests SBSE is a highly accurate diagnostic fool for evaluating CAD compared with treadmill testing; the maximum cardiovascular performance can be achieved With lower values of heart rate, suggesting the echo test is more feasible. Treadmill testing could lose important information about the existence, extension, and location of CAD; ire contrast, SBSE detects even small, quickly reversible wall motion abnormalities. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

Clinical application of exercise stress echocardiography: Supine bicycle or treadmill? / Dagianti, Alessandra; Penco, Bandiera; Sgorbini, ; Fedele, Francesco. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9149. - STAMPA. - 81:12 A(1998), pp. 62G-67G. (Intervento presentato al convegno 9th International Congress on Echocardiography - Clinical Cardiology tenutosi a ROME, ITALY nel FEB 05-08, 1997) [10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00056-3].

Clinical application of exercise stress echocardiography: Supine bicycle or treadmill?

DAGIANTI, Alessandra;FEDELE, Francesco
1998

Abstract

Although exercise stress echocardiography is currently used to evaluate coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, the best exercise methodology is still undefined. The objectives of the study were: (1) to compare supine bicycle stress echocardiography (SBSE) and treadmill in the evaluation of CAD; and (2) to define, in normal subjects, the different behavior of factors determining MVO2 wish treadmill and SBSE. We selected 10 male patients with CAD (group A), and 10 male control subjects (group B). Each patient underwent SBSE and tread-mill testing in random order. We studied heart sate, systolic blood pressure, heart rate x systolic blood pressure, and end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes. in group A, we also studied wall motion score index (according to the American Society of Echocardiography) and in group B, systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume index. The results were as follows: Group A: SBSE resulted in significantly lower work load, heart rate, and significantly higher systolic blood pressure, heart hate x systolic blood pressure, end-diastolic volume index, end-systolic volume index, and wall motion score index. SBSE showed wall motion abnormalities in each patient, whereas treadmill did not detect wail motion abnormalities in 4 patients (3 single-vessel; 1 multivessel); of the other 6 patients, 2 showed a lower wall motion score index and 4 did not show any difference in left ventricle kinetics with the 2 methodologies of exercise. Mean acquisition time for postexercise images was 72 +/- 6 seconds. Group B: SBSE resulted in lower work load, heart rate, heart rate x systolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume index, and higher end-diastolic volume index and end-systolic volume index. Systolic blood pressure was similar with SBSE and treadmill testing. In conclusion, our experience suggests SBSE is a highly accurate diagnostic fool for evaluating CAD compared with treadmill testing; the maximum cardiovascular performance can be achieved With lower values of heart rate, suggesting the echo test is more feasible. Treadmill testing could lose important information about the existence, extension, and location of CAD; ire contrast, SBSE detects even small, quickly reversible wall motion abnormalities. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
1998
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Clinical application of exercise stress echocardiography: Supine bicycle or treadmill? / Dagianti, Alessandra; Penco, Bandiera; Sgorbini, ; Fedele, Francesco. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9149. - STAMPA. - 81:12 A(1998), pp. 62G-67G. (Intervento presentato al convegno 9th International Congress on Echocardiography - Clinical Cardiology tenutosi a ROME, ITALY nel FEB 05-08, 1997) [10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00056-3].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/73354
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact