We systematically investigate charge-ordering phases by means of a restricted and unrestricted Gutzwiller approximation to the single-band Hubbard model with nearest- (t) and next-nearest- (t(')) neighbor hopping. When parallel to t(')/t parallel to is small, as appropriate for La2-xSrxCuO4, stripes are found, whereas in compounds with larger parallel to t(')/t parallel to (such as Ca2-xNaxCuO2Cl2 and Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+delta) checkerboard structures are favored. In contrast to the linear doping dependence found for stripes the charge periodicity of checkerboard textures is locked to 4 unit cells over a wide doping range. In addition we find that checkerboard structures are favored at surfaces.
Checkerboard and stripe inhomogeneities in cuprates / G., Seibold; J., Lorenzana; Grilli, Marco. - In: PHYSICAL REVIEW. B, CONDENSED MATTER AND MATERIALS PHYSICS. - ISSN 1098-0121. - 75:10(2007), pp. 100505:1-100505:4. [10.1103/physrevb.75.100505]
Checkerboard and stripe inhomogeneities in cuprates
GRILLI, Marco
2007
Abstract
We systematically investigate charge-ordering phases by means of a restricted and unrestricted Gutzwiller approximation to the single-band Hubbard model with nearest- (t) and next-nearest- (t(')) neighbor hopping. When parallel to t(')/t parallel to is small, as appropriate for La2-xSrxCuO4, stripes are found, whereas in compounds with larger parallel to t(')/t parallel to (such as Ca2-xNaxCuO2Cl2 and Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+delta) checkerboard structures are favored. In contrast to the linear doping dependence found for stripes the charge periodicity of checkerboard textures is locked to 4 unit cells over a wide doping range. In addition we find that checkerboard structures are favored at surfaces.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.