Objective: Trait Emotional Intelligence (or “trait emotional self-efficacy”) as a personality trait differs from Emotional Intelligence as cognitive ability, i.e. the ability to perceive, integrate and regulate emotions. Trait EI, instead, is currently defined as a constellation of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions located at the lower level of personality hierarchies. Emotional intelligence is deemed to promote personal growth and thus appears a crucial factor in the coaching process. In this paper we aimed to investigate difference in TEI within four different groups. The main goal was to point out a profile of strengths and weaknesses of the different job roles. Design: A questionnaire that measures Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEIQue) was administered to participants (30 coaches, 88 managers, 100 employees and 90 university students). A multivariate profile analysis (MANOVA) was conducted in order to depict differences between these groups. Method: The TEIQue consists of 153 item and 13 facets, organized under four second order factors: well-being, self-control, emotionality and sociability. All scales exhibited good internal reliability. Results: Results pointed out that groups have different profiles. In general coaches and managers scores higher on most of the different sub-scales of the TEIQue. Conclusion: This paper aimed to have practical implications for the professional efficacy of coaches and managers. In fact, it appears that high level of emotional self-efficacy and emotional intelligence (as a trait) are pivotal to gain higher job responsibilities (in case of managers) and to promote professional and personal developmental processes (in case of the coaches).

How is trait emotional intelligence important for different professional roles? An empirical contribution / C., Rizzo; Chirumbolo, Antonio. - ELETTRONICO. - (2013). (Intervento presentato al convegno 3rd International Congress of Coaching Psychology tenutosi a ROMA nel 16-17 MAGGIO 2013).

How is trait emotional intelligence important for different professional roles? An empirical contribution

CHIRUMBOLO, Antonio
2013

Abstract

Objective: Trait Emotional Intelligence (or “trait emotional self-efficacy”) as a personality trait differs from Emotional Intelligence as cognitive ability, i.e. the ability to perceive, integrate and regulate emotions. Trait EI, instead, is currently defined as a constellation of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions located at the lower level of personality hierarchies. Emotional intelligence is deemed to promote personal growth and thus appears a crucial factor in the coaching process. In this paper we aimed to investigate difference in TEI within four different groups. The main goal was to point out a profile of strengths and weaknesses of the different job roles. Design: A questionnaire that measures Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEIQue) was administered to participants (30 coaches, 88 managers, 100 employees and 90 university students). A multivariate profile analysis (MANOVA) was conducted in order to depict differences between these groups. Method: The TEIQue consists of 153 item and 13 facets, organized under four second order factors: well-being, self-control, emotionality and sociability. All scales exhibited good internal reliability. Results: Results pointed out that groups have different profiles. In general coaches and managers scores higher on most of the different sub-scales of the TEIQue. Conclusion: This paper aimed to have practical implications for the professional efficacy of coaches and managers. In fact, it appears that high level of emotional self-efficacy and emotional intelligence (as a trait) are pivotal to gain higher job responsibilities (in case of managers) and to promote professional and personal developmental processes (in case of the coaches).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/656128
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact