Architectural drawing follows a projective canon that was established at the end of XVIII century in the Beaux-Arts cultural environment. Its operational procedures are mainly ruled by Gaspard Monge’s Descriptive Geometry as well as graphic standards’ diffuse adoption but they have been conceived primarily to represent spatial phenomena. The former fundament allows drafters to produce a two-dimensional image from a three-dimensional reality but only at a specific time. The latter one offers the opportunity to associate symbols and signs to specific meanings but their comprehension is possible only when transmitter and receiver share the same cultural background and, moreover, it is changing in time. In XX century a growing number of artists and architects has found this representational canon a bit too restrictive as it does not allow to represent time flowing but only space. They were obviously influenced by cubist researches as well as photographic and cinematic pioneers but, most o
“Unorthodox orthographies”: projective deregulation for depicting time from Le Corbusier to OMA / Colonnese, Fabio. - ELETTRONICO. - (2014), pp. 166-171. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2014 Design Communication Conference. tenutosi a Atlanta (Georgia), Southern Polytechnic State University nel 01-04 October 2014).
“Unorthodox orthographies”: projective deregulation for depicting time from Le Corbusier to OMA
COLONNESE, Fabio
2014
Abstract
Architectural drawing follows a projective canon that was established at the end of XVIII century in the Beaux-Arts cultural environment. Its operational procedures are mainly ruled by Gaspard Monge’s Descriptive Geometry as well as graphic standards’ diffuse adoption but they have been conceived primarily to represent spatial phenomena. The former fundament allows drafters to produce a two-dimensional image from a three-dimensional reality but only at a specific time. The latter one offers the opportunity to associate symbols and signs to specific meanings but their comprehension is possible only when transmitter and receiver share the same cultural background and, moreover, it is changing in time. In XX century a growing number of artists and architects has found this representational canon a bit too restrictive as it does not allow to represent time flowing but only space. They were obviously influenced by cubist researches as well as photographic and cinematic pioneers but, most oI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.